Armstrong Whitworth A.W.41 Albemarle
1940
Back to the Virtual Aircraft Museum
  TRANSPORT, TOW PLANEVirtual Aircraft Museum / United Kingdom / Armstrong Whitworth  

Armstrong Whitworth A.W.41 Albemarle

Conceived originally by the Bristol company as a medium bomber, the design was taken over by Armstrong Whitworth and reworked into a reconnaissance-bomber. More than 40 were built before it was decided to change the role and produce subsequent aircraft either as special transports or as glider tugs. The first ST.I and GT.I entered RAF service in mid-1942 and early 1943 respectively, and subsequent versions brought the total number of Albemarles built to 600. Albemarles took part in the Sicily, Normandy and Arnhem operations.

3-View 
Armstrong Whitworth A.W.41 AlbemarleA three-view drawing (686 x 654)


Specification 
 CREW4
 ENGINE2 x Bristol "Hercules", 1186kW
 WEIGHTS
    Take-off weight10251 kg22600 lb
 DIMENSIONS
    Wingspan23.47 m77 ft 0 in
    Length18.26 m59 ft 11 in
    Height4.75 m15 ft 7 in
    Wing area74.65 m2803.53 sq ft
 PERFORMANCE
    Max. speed426 km/h265 mph
    Ceiling5485 m18000 ft
    Range2092 km1300 miles
 ARMAMENT2 x 7.7mm machine-guns

Armstrong Whitworth A.W.41 Albemarle

Comments 
Art Deco, 25.10.2009

The Albemarle, while totally mediocre, was the successful culmination of an Air Ministry specification. It came exactly as ordered. It was only the private venture genius and persisting of Geoffrey De Havilland and the Mosquito that put it in perspective as a piece of crap. The Bristol Brigand etc. also suffered by comparison. It's original manufacture was understandable, but it's continued production was folly. It's service as a glider tug was serendipitous in that it performed a function and covered up stupidity. Thus, it was a true multi-role aircraft. And significantly, it was not the worst folly produced.

aerophile, magister29, 25.10.2009

You may wish to add that the poor old Albemarle was offered to the USSR in the middle years of the War and, for some weeks, one or more with Red Star markings were to be seea flying in the vicinity of Hurn airfield. The Russian opinion of this sad aircraft was no higher than our own. I'm personally glad, though, that it eventually had an important role as a glider tug in all those important airborne landings. An unfortunate and unsuccessful aircraft, perhaps, but not a heap of rubbish, thank you.

JOHN ANTONY BURLS, JOHNABURLS(@)HOTMAIL.CO.UK, 13.07.2008

When staying at airfield as ATC cadet during war, forgotten which drome, watched an Albemarle come in with wheels up and crash land successfully! Then went up in Horsa behind a Halifax, switching from high tow to low very rough, think I was only one not sick!

Mick Dunne, hotideas(@)hotmail.com, 29.12.2007

This heap of flying rubbish was a contempary of the Mitchel and Marauder! Say no more! Sorry! contempory...

Mick Dunne, hotideas(@)hotmail.com, 29.12.2007

This heap of flying rubbish was a contempary of the Mitchel and Marauder! Say no more!

Mr William Lewis, williamjohnlewis(@)msn.com, 31.08.2007

DID ANY OF THE dIFFERENT MARKS OF THIS AIRCRAFT HAVE A DOOR IN THE PORT SIDE OF THE FUSALGE FOR THE ENTRY OF PARATROOPERS, OR DID ALL AIRCRAFT HAVE THE ENTRANCE AND EXIT UNDER THE FUSALGE.

Do you have any comments about this aircraft ?

Name    E-mail


COMPANY
PROFILE



All the World's Rotorcraft


Virtual Aircraft Museum


All rhe World's Rotorcraft AVIATION TOP 100 - www.avitop.com Avitop.com