|
|
The Barracuda was the first monoplane torpedo bomber to go into service with the FAA. The original S.24/37 was designed round the Rolls-Royce Exe 24-cylinder X-type engine. Early in the construction stage the power plant was changed to the Rolls-Royce Merlin 30, an engine with many entirely different characteristics. The delay this caused was responsible for retarding the initial production programme. The Merlin-engined prototype first flew on 7 December 1940.
The first prototype Barracuda had an unbraced tailplane in line with the top of the fuselage. During the early trials it was found that when the flaps were in the diving position the disturbed air caused serious tail flutter. To overcome this the tailplane of the second prototype was raised some 1.22m to clear the wake from the flaps and also to clear the folding wings. The first trials with the repositioned tail unit were made in July 1941 and showed that the trouble had been entirely eliminated.
The Barracuda was first used operationally in September 1941 in raids from HMS Victorious on Kirkenes in northern Norway and on Petsamo in Finland. In 1942 Barracudas took part in sweeps over French ports and in the invasion of Madagascar. The first major action in which Barracuda squadrons took part was the successful bombing attack on the German battleship Tirpitz
in Alten Fiord, north Norway on 3 April 1944. It was in action against the Japanese for the first time in an attack on enemy installations at Sabang, on the island of Sumatra on 19 April 1944.
Production of the Barracuda ended in 1946, by which time more than 2,500 had been built: as the Barracuda I with a Merlin 30 engine; Barracuda II with a 1,222kW Merlin 32 engine; Barracuda III, similar to the Mk II but with ASV 10 radar equipment in a bulge under the fuselage; and Barracuda V (first flown in June 1945) with a Rolls-Royce Griffon VII engine driving a Rotol four-bladed propeller, increased wing span, larger rudder and fin, generally strengthened structure, no rear armament but one 12.7mm forward-firing machine-gun.
 | A three-view drawing (670 x 546) |
| MODEL | Fairey "Barracuda" Mk.II |
| CREW | 3 |
| ENGINE | 1 x Rolls-Royce Merlin 32, 1223kW |
| WEIGHTS |
| Take-off weight | 6396 kg | 14101 lb |
| Empty weight | 4241 kg | 9350 lb |
| DIMENSIONS |
| Wingspan | 14.99 m | 49 ft 2 in |
| Length | 12.12 m | 39 ft 9 in |
| Height | 4.6 m | 15 ft 1 in |
| Wing area | 4.09 m2 | 44.02 sq ft |
| PERFORMANCE |
| Max. speed | 367 km/h | 228 mph |
| Cruise speed | 311 km/h | 193 mph |
| Ceiling | 5060 m | 16600 ft |
| Range | 1101 km | 684 miles |
| ARMAMENT | 2 x 7.7mm machine-guns, 1 x 735kg torpedo or 726kg of bombs |
| Des Fforde, ffordes(@)aol.com, 13.10.2009 I'm just reading 'Barracuda Pilot, by Dunstan Hadley. He flew the Barracuda and speaks well of it. A lot harder to fly than a Swordfish! but rewarding. | | Leo Rudnicki, leo_rudnicki(@)hotmail.com, 27.05.2009 During the war there was considerable secrecy regarding FAA equipment, to prevent embarassment over the total lack of effort or priority. the Barracuda's Tirpitz attack was the first reported use, one of many successful attacks on the Tirpitz. It's operational debut was delayed somewhat by 5 aircraft flipping into the ocean during practise torpedo attacks. Winkle Brown was called in, tried the procedure at altitude, recovered, and reported. This was on PRODUCTION Barracudas. Yes, the Barracuda was as good as it looked. Congrats, Mr. Ward on your survival. Apparently, the FAA Museum has wreckage of two examples. How apt! | | Eddy Taylor, gek.eddy(@)yahoo.co.uk, 27.05.2009 The Barracuda was first used operationally in September 1941 in raids from HMS Victorious on Kirkenes in northern Norway and on Petsamo in Finland.
Sorry, the raids in question above were on 30th/31st July and Albacores and Fulmars were involved | | andy denney, andyjdenney(@)aol.com, 09.06.2008 I have an old cockpit canopy for sale. Please contact me for further details | | LEONA, LEONA.F.HUGHES(@)GMAIL.COM, 18.12.2007 THIS IS OBVIOUSLY THE PLANE EVERYONE LOVES TO HATE... | | Lee M Ward, leeward(@)firenet.uk.net, 26.04.2007 I forgot to mention the speed figures quoted. Although I am unfamiliar with km/h and only understand mph and knots, I can say that the figures quoted are quite wrong. If the Barra had been as fast as quoted it might have been something, but in fact it was overloaded and under-powered, and slow, slow, slow, among its other many faults. | | Lee M Ward, leeward(@)firenet.uk.net, 26.04.2007 Our cruising speed in the Mk.III was 135knots. Take-off with full boost and rockets, unloaded, from the escort carrier Smiter, was only just achievable. As a replacement for the Swordfish it was a failure. The dive brakes when released were positively dangerous. Altogether, a dead- loss; perhaps that's why the navy do not have a single complete specimen in their museum - no thanks for the memory! |
|
Do you have any comments about this aircraft ?
|
| |