|
|
Designed by W G Carter to meet the demands of Specification
F.9/37 calling for a twin-engined single-seater,
this Gloster fighter was of all-metal stressed skin construction.
It was intended to carry a fuselage-mounted
armament of two 20mm Hispano cannon and four
7.7mm Browning machine guns. Two prototypes
were ordered, the first of these, powered by two 1050hp Bristol Taurus T-S(a) 14-cylinder radials, being
flown on 3 April 1939. The aircraft attained a maximum
speed of 579km/h at 4575m, but
was badly damaged in a landing accident early in its
flight test programme. When testing was resumed in
April 1940, it had been re-engined with 900hp Taurus
T-S(a) Ills with the result that performance suffered,
maximum attainable speed in level flight being reduced
to 534km/h at 4630m. The
second prototype, meanwhile, had been completed
with 885hp Rolls-Royce Peregrine liquid-cooled
engines, flying for the first time on 22 February 1940,
and attaining a maximum speed of 531km/h
during subsequent flight testing. Although the handling
characteristics of Gloster's F.9/37 contender were
considered highly satisfactory and performance with
the original engines had proved spectacular, no production
was ordered.
| ENGINE | 2 x Bristol Taurus T-S(a), 1050hp |
| WEIGHTS |
| Take-off weight | 5269 kg | 11616 lb |
| Empty weight | 4004 kg | 8827 lb |
| DIMENSIONS |
| Wingspan | 15.24 m | 50 ft 0 in |
| Length | 11.27 m | 36 ft 12 in |
| Height | 3.53 m | 11 ft 7 in |
| Wing area | 35.85 m2 | 385.89 sq ft |
| PERFORMANCE |
| Max. speed | 579 km/h | 360 mph |
 | A three-view drawing (1673 x 1183) |
| paul scott, psmiddx(@)yahoo.com, 20.08.2009 Ha ha, like that comment, Art Deco, or had no gun like the RAF version of the Eurofighter Typhoon, no doubt! I suppose it 'may' have meant the Mosquito would've been shelved, though that was more multi-role, or that the F-9 would've at least been overshadowed had the mossie entered service, still, it might not have broken up like the mossie in the far east, being metal and not stuck together with 'pritt'! | | Art Deco, 15.07.2009 Definitely political. If it was fitted with a Boulton-Paul 4-gun turret instead of forward firing guns ( in the most unusual location ) it would have won contracts and priorities. | | Johned, Moaney1958(@)aol.com, 14.07.2009 Appears to be yet another fine British design wasted. Why was not a production contract forthcoming - another instance of Ministry lack of foresight perhaps? The prototype performance figures indicated the potential for a very promising heavy fighter which with further development could have served throughout WW2. |
|
Do you have any comments about this aircraft ?
|
| |