|
|
Conceived as a means of applying the promised advantages
of jet propulsion to a single-seat fighter flying
boat for use in the Pacific, the SR.44 was proposed by
Saunders-Roe (Saro) during 1943. This proposal led to a
contract for three prototypes being placed in May 1944
to Specification E.6/44. To be designated SR.A/1 before
first flight, the fighter was of light alloy construction
throughout, power being provided by two Metropolitan
Vickers F2/4 Beryl turbojets and provision being
made for an armament of four 20mm cannon grouped
in the forward hull above the air intake. The first SR.A/1
did not fly until 16 July 1947, its Beryl turbojets each being rated at 1465kg. The second flew
on 30 April 1948 with 1587kg Beryls and
the third followed on 17 August of that year with fully rated
Beryls of 1746kg. As no operational
requirement remained for a fighter flying boat, official
interest waned, and, after a brief revival of interest
during the Korean War, the last surviving SR.A/1 was
retired in June 1951.
| MODEL | SR.A/1 |
| CREW | 1 |
| ENGINE | 2 x Metropolitan-Vickers F2/4 Beryl turbojets, 1474-1746kg |
| WEIGHTS |
| Take-off weight | 8633 kg | 19033 lb |
| Empty weight | 5108 kg | 11261 lb |
| DIMENSIONS |
| Wingspan | 14.02 m | 45 ft 12 in |
| Length | 15.24 m | 50 ft 0 in |
| Height | 5.11 m | 16 ft 9 in |
| Wing area | 38.60 m2 | 415.49 sq ft |
| PERFORMANCE |
| Max. speed | 824 km/h | 512 mph |
 | A three-view drawing (1685 x 1120) |
Sgt.KAR98, 27.12.2007 What was the size of this plane? Corsairoz, trevsastar(@)hotmail.com, 04.12.2007 The last remaining SRA-1 is still in perfect condition and survives in Solentsky Museum in Southampton UK.
|
|
Do you have any comments concerning this aircraft ?
|
|  COMPANY PROFILE
FACTS AND FIGURES© The axial-flow Beryl engine was
chosen because two of them could
be mounted side-by-side in a
relatively narrow fuselage. © The position of the small cockpit
enclosure on the fuselage meant that
the pilot's view ahead disappeared
during the take-off run. © The possibility of water ingestion into
the nose-mounted intake was the
reason for its high position in the nose.
| |
|
|