Vickers 279 Venom
1936
Back to the Virtual Aircraft Museum
  FIGHTERVirtual Aircraft Museum / United Kingdom / Vickers  

Vickers 279 Venom

Fundamentally a redesigned and improved Type 151 Jockey and, indeed, initially known as the Jockey II, the Type 279, for which Vickers adopted the name Venom, was intended to meet the requirements of Specification F.5/34. Powered by a 625hp Bristol Aquila AE.3S nine-cylinder sleeve-valve radial engine enclosed by a long-chord NACA cowling, the Venom was a highly sophisticated aircraft, with a metal monocoque fuselage, its stressed skin being affixed by countersunk rivets. It was unique at the time it entered flight test, on 17 June 1936, in having 90°-deflection flaps. The Venom retained the sideways-hinging engine feature of the Type 151, and a battery of eight 7.7mm machine guns was mounted in the wings from the start of test flying. The Venom proved exceptionally manoeuvrable, with outstanding roll rate and turning radius, but it lacked the power to compete seriously with its Rolls-Royce liquid-cooled Vee-type-engined contemporaries, and, as no sufficiently compact British air-cooled radial of adequate power was available for installation, it was scrapped in 1939.

3-View 
Vickers 279 VenomA three-view drawing (1280 x 914)


Specification 
 WEIGHTS
    Take-off weight1885 kg4156 lb
 DIMENSIONS
    Wingspan9.98 m32 ft 9 in
    Length7.36 m24 ft 2 in
    Height3.27 m10 ft 9 in
    Wing area13.56 m2145.96 sq ft
 PERFORMANCE
    Max. speed502 km/h312 mph
    Ceiling9755 m32000 ft

Vickers 279 Venom

Comments 
Pure, Pureteenlard(@)hotmail.com, 11.04.2008

Alas! the taurus was only ever used by two aircraft as far as I am aware - Beaufort and Albacore torpedo bombers - and was never really developed. Perhaps a Twin Wasp might have been a better idea?

roy dutch, dutchemdutch(@)aol.com, 04.10.2007

possibly good but not good enough to rival the spitfire

Hedrikus Neticus, klaverenneet(@)planet.nl, 14.02.2007

Why was there no compact radial? A 14 cylinder development of the aquila dit exist! It could have been a class of its own. The engine I refer to is the Taurus.
An english mistery?


Hendricus Neticus

Hedrikus Neticus, klaverenneet(@)planet.nl, 14.02.2007

Why was there no compact radial? A 14 cylinder development of the aquila dit exist! It could have been a class of its own. The engine I refer to is the Taurus.
An english mistery?


Hendricus Neticus

Do you have any comments about this aircraft ?

Name    E-mail


COMPANY
PROFILE



All the World's Rotorcraft


Virtual Aircraft Museum


All rhe World's Rotorcraft AVIATION TOP 100 - www.avitop.com Avitop.com