|
|
The first attempt by Westland to develop a monoplane fighter evolved from a private venture prototype designed - by the company's draughtsmen in their spare time - during 1926 with high speed performance the primary objective. Known simply as the Racer, this unarmed parasol monoplane of mixed construction was powered by a 275hp Rolls Royce Falcon III inline engine and flew in November 1926. Badly damaged in a forced landing in 1927, the Racer was rebuilt in much modified form as the Wizard fighter. In this form, it was primarily of metal construction and had a 490hp unsupercharged Rolls-Royce F.XI 12-cylinder Vee-type water:cooled engine in a more streamlined nose cowling, with a retractable radiator in the underside of the fuselage. The Wizard - which was flying by late 1927 - used a similar parasol wing to that of the Racer, this being mounted close to the fuselage on tandem pylons on the fuselage centreline. Two 7.7mm Vickers guns were mounted semi-externally in the fuselage sides. The Wizard's performance, and particularly its rate of climb, attracted a modicum of Air Ministry interest and a contract to cover testing at Martlesham Heath. There, the pilot's forward view was found unsatisfactory, leading Westland to design and fit a new wing with changed planform outboard, new inset ailerons and a thinner centre section, mounted on more conventional cabane strutting. A supercharged 500hp Kestrel II (F.XIS) was fitted, but in this final form, the Wizard II, as it was sometimes known, demonstrated a reduced performance and failed to persuade the Air Ministry to change its policy towards monoplane fighters.
 | A three-view drawing (650 x 451) |
| WEIGHTS |
| Take-off weight | 1486 kg | 3276 lb |
| Empty weight | 1067 kg | 2352 lb |
| DIMENSIONS |
| Wingspan | 12.04 m | 39 ft 6 in |
| Length | 8.18 m | 26 ft 10 in |
| Height | 2.84 m | 9 ft 4 in |
| Wing area | 22.11 m2 | 237.99 sq ft |
| PERFORMANCE |
| Max. speed | 303 km/h | 188 mph |
| Bob Sizeland, bob.sizeland(@)hotmail.co.uk, 25.07.2008 A wonderful looking aircraft, but no surprise the ministry said no to it. Is there an example still in existance or at least a more detailed study of it published somewhere? I am about to model the aircraft in 1/5th scale for radio control and could do with as much detail as possible for obvious reasons. Any help in this would be very much appreciated. |
|
Do you have any comments about this aircraft ?
|
| |