|
|
Few aircraft (if any) can have been as hair-raising to fly as the Messerschmitt Me 163 Komet. The first production examples were delivered to a new fighter wing, JG 400, in May 1944, but it was not until 16 August of that year that these revolutionary aircraft had their first (unsuccessful) brush with an Allied bomber stream. Their development can be said to have originated from work begun in 1933 by Dr Alexander Lippisch at the German Gliding Research Institute (DFS) at Darmstadt, being based on the Lippisch-designed DFS 194. Dr Lippisch and his staff were transferred to Messerschmitt's works at Augsburg in January 1939.
In early 1940 the DFS 194 was equipped with a rocket motor at Peenemunde. After test flights by Heini Dittmar had confirmed speeds of up to 550km/h on the power of a single 2.94kN Walter motor, there was sufficient interest to initiate development. In 1941 the first Me 163 prototype was being tested in gliding flight and shortly after was fitted with a 7.35kN Walter RII-203 rocket motor. Speeds of up to 915km/h were achieved (limited by the volume of liquid propellants carried) and to gain some idea of the speed potential, this aircraft was towed to a high altitude before being released. Flown under power, a speed of over 1,000km/h was attained before the engine had to be throttled back because the aircraft was becoming uncontrollable.
Operational Me 163B were powered by the 16.67kN Walter 109-509A-2 rocket motor. Each had mid-set monoplane wings of wooden construction and the fuselage was a semi-monocoque all-metal structure. Landing gear comprised a tailwheel, jettisonable main-wheel trolley and a central underfuselage skid which was extended for landing.
Produced too late and in only small numbers (about 360 examples), they were in service in the defence of the Reich early in 1945 but had no significant impact upon the constant streams of Allied bombers attacking Germany. In theory their high speed and initial rate of climb of about 3,600m/minute should have made them a potent interceptor, despite the enormous hazards of training pilots and using these rocket-planes operationally. Had they enjoyed a longer period of development before introduction into service in the closing stages of the war, the story might have been very different.
The slightly larger Me 163C development - with aerodynamic refinements, pressurised cockpit and blister-type canopy, and more powerful Walter 109-509C rocket motor - was built only in prototype and pre-production form. It did not enter service, although it was almost ready for delivery to Luftwaffe squadrons at the time of the German surrender. With this version, endurance was increased from eight-ten minutes to twelve minutes; this could be extended by periods of gliding.
| CREW | 1 |
| ENGINE | 1 x rocket engine Walter HWK 109-509A, 15.7kN |
| WEIGHTS |
| Take-off weight | 4310 kg | 9502 lb |
| Empty weight | 1908 kg | 4206 lb |
| DIMENSIONS |
| Wingspan | 9.3 m | 30 ft 6 in |
| Length | 5.9 m | 19 ft 4 in |
| Height | 2.8 m | 9 ft 2 in |
| Wing area | 18.5 m2 | 199.13 sq ft |
| PERFORMANCE |
| Max. speed | 955 km/h | 593 mph |
| ARMAMENT | 2 machine-guns |
| Trevor Ridgway, t_d_ridgway(@)yahoo.com.au, 20.12.2008 Noah Schachtman ( spelling ? ) has a site which itemises the ingredients of T-Stoff & C-Stoff . The Hydrogen Peroxide interacts explosively with the Hydrazine Hydrate etc which propelled the rocket plane and which caused the deaths of the pilots when the craft landed roughly rather than any ground crew who would be filling the tanks BUT NOT MIXING IT ON THE GROUND. | | Tom, les_indestructibles(@)one.lt, 28.11.2008 Well, I studied in a chemistry lesson, that there are some gears, that separates H and 2O | | CB, CowboyBHS(@)gmail.com, 26.05.2008 I would like to know where to get or how to make the liquid O2. Where can u get it? and any larger designs. BTW, Rob, DON'T DOUBLE POST!!! | | Terrell CARTER, Terrellone(@)comcast.net, 15.03.2008 do you know what fuels the the 163 used when put together ignited. | | Dan, rayfinseats(@)gmail.com, 15.03.2008 History channel did a story on it. | | ShelbS, 27.10.2007 I read that Me-163 pilots only managed to shoot down 9 or 10 bombers | | james millerIV, triggerfish101(@)hotmail.com, 29.09.2007 need larger blueprints, top side and front view and each on separate plates or pages | | Tim, pbthhh(@)hotmail.com, 08.08.2007 Fuels: 82.3% concentration H2O2 & 100% pure liquid O2. Luftwaffe training films for ground crews show the volatility when exposed to air: a rag with 1/2 oz of H2O2 on it has 3 DROPS of liquid O2 placed on it. The rag immediately bursts into flames. Pilots were taught if they were forced to crash land while still carrying ANY amount of T-Stoff & C-Stoff (the operational names for the two chemicals) to eject the canopy, clamber out onto the wing, roll up into a ball, and jump rather than ride the craft into the ground. On more than one occasion, men trapped in crash-lands were victims to the fuel tanks rupturing and filling the cockpit, dissolving them alive. | | Robert Allbright, rgagraphics(@)earthlink.net, 24.01.2007 What were the two fuels this aircraft used? One was Hydrogen Peroxide and Nitrous Oxide. One fuel mixture was so dangerous that if you dipped you hand into the bucket of fuel, your hand would be reduced to bones only, no skin. I understand that more people were killed mixing the fuel than the pilots. Please get me information on these topics. Thank you. RGA | | Robert Allbright, rgagraphics(@)earthlink.net, 24.01.2007 What were the two fuels this aircraft used? One was Hydrogen Peroxide and Nitrous Oxide. One fuel mixture was so dangerous that if you dipped you hand into the bucket of fuel, your hand would be reduced to bones only, no skin. I understand that more people were killed mixing the fuel than the pilots. Please get me information on these topics. Thank you. RGA |
|
Do you have any comments about this aircraft ?
|
|  COMPANY PROFILE
FACTS AND FIGURES© Armament was two powerful
but slow-firing 30mm
cannon. The pilot had little
time to aim and hold his fire
before he was past the target.
One or two hits was usually
enough to destroy a bomber,
however. © The fuels in the Komet were
highly corrosive and would dissolve
organic material (such as the pilot).
To avoid this, the pilots would
wear special asbestos fibre suits. © The Komet took off on a two-wheeled
trolley, which was quickly
jettisoned. A retractable skid was
used for landing, a bumpy process
which sometimes caused unburned
fuels to mix and ignite. © Combat tactics were to climb to
altitude above the target and then
turn off the motor to make diving
attacks before restarting to climb
again. When fuel was exhausted
the Komet became a glider and
very vulnerable to fighter attack.
| |
|
|