Messerschmitt Me-262
1941
Back to the Virtual Aircraft Museum
  INTERCEPTORVirtual Aircraft Museum / Germany / Messerschmitt  

Messerschmitt Me-262

What would have been the outcome of the war in Europe if in 1940 the potential of Messerschmitt's Project 1065 had been appreciated by high authority? If a crash programme had been originated to put this turbojet-powered aircraft into service at a much earlier date, would the Luftwaffe have regained the initiative of the first two years of World War II?

Unfortunately the answers are not clear cut and there is no space here to discuss the pros and cons. It must suffice that the Me 262 (as the P.1065 became designated) was the world's first turbojet-powered aircraft to enter operational service - at Juvincourt, France on 10 July 1944. By then, however, the end of hostilities in Europe was only ten months away: the lack of a real plan for the deployment of these aircraft and the inadequacy of tactics to gain full benefit of their' speed advantage could not be rectified in so short a time - especially under the chaotic conditions existing in Germany and with dwindling supplies of fuel .

Messerschmitt's P.1065 design had originated as early as 1938 when the Reichsluftfahrtministerium had requested the company to design a twin-engined fighter able to utilise the new turbojet engines being developed in Germany. After inspection of the mock-up, three prototypes were ordered on 1 June 1940. But because the engines to power the Me 262 had not been developed sufficiently, the first prototype flew initially with piston engines. It was not until 18 July 1942 that the first flight with all-turbojet power was recorded. (The Heinkel 280, which did not enter production, had flown before the Me 262, on 2 April 1941, so becoming the world's first twin-engined jet.)

Of conventional all-metal stressed-skin construction, the wing had moderate sweepback, long-span ailerons, trailing-edge flaps, and full-span automatic leading-edge slots. The engines were mounted beneath the wing to preclude a complex wing-spar structure and the landing gear was of retractable tailwheel type. The fifth prototype introduced a non-retractable nosewheel unit and the sixth was the first to have a fully retractable tricycle-type landing gear.

First major version was the Me 262A-1a Schwalbe (Swallow) interceptor, armed with four 30mm MK 108 cannon mounted in the nose. It was powered by two 8.825kN Junkers Jumo 109-004B-1 eight-stage axial-flow turbo-jets. A number of variants were built with differing armament. The other major version was the Me 262A-2a Sturmvogel (Stormbird) bomber. This was produced at the insistence of Adolf Hitler - a decision which caused considerable overall production delays. It carried, in addition to the standard MK 108 armament, one 1,000kg, two 500kg or two 250kg bombs. As with the Schwalbe, there were a number of variants, mainly for armed or unarmed reconnaissance.

Messerschmitt Me-262


Specification 
 MODELMe-262A-1a
 CREW1
 ENGINE2 x Junkers Jumo 004B-1/-2/-3, 8.82kN
 WEIGHTS
    Take-off weight6400 kg14110 lb
    Empty weight3800 kg8378 lb
 DIMENSIONS
    Wingspan12.48 m40 ft 11 in
    Length10.6 m34 ft 9 in
    Height3.84 m12 ft 7 in
    Wing area21.7 m2233.58 sq ft
 PERFORMANCE
    Max. speed870 km/h541 mph
    Ceiling11450 m37550 ft
    Range1050 km652 miles
 ARMAMENT4 x 30mm cannons

3-View 
Messerschmitt Me-262A three-view drawing (1667 x 1123)

Comments 
Guy Tremblay, cargosigns(@)hotmail.com, 09.11.2008

Compare the design with the Airbus 380. Almost the same
solutions, 60 years later

Mahon MacRi, mahonmacri(@)yahoo.ca, 03.08.2008

Your information on the armament of the "schnellbomber" version is incorrect. Having read a great deal about the Me 262, I have discovered that the Sturmvogel (bomber) version only had TWO MK108 30mm cannon in the nose instead of the four mounted MK108 cannon mounted in the Schwalbe (fighter) version. The reason for this had to do with CG (centre of gravity) issues and the added weight of bombs carried in the nose area; bombs were carried immediately behind the nosewheel under the front end of the fuselage.

wuwu, rkocot(@)gmail.com, 16.07.2008

Russel - you can not compare Me-262 with P-80, it's not the same level of jets evolution, you can compare P-80 with MiG-15, or Me-262 with Gloster Meteor. All at all, the Me-262 fought in the WW2, P-80 didn't. So there is one conclusion - at the same time Me-262 was more advanced than P-80.

regards

Russell Taliaferro, comanche24(@)bellsouth.net, 18.05.2008

How did the performance of the ME262 compare with the Lockheed P-80?

Do you have any comments about this aircraft ?

Name    E-mail


COMPANY
PROFILE



All the World's Rotorcraft


Virtual Aircraft Museum


All rhe World's Rotorcraft AVIATION TOP 100 - www.avitop.com Avitop.com