Aerospatiale/BAC Concorde
Back to the Virtual Aircraft Museum
  PASSENGERVirtual Aircraft Museum / International / Aerospatiale/BAC  

Aerospatiale/BAC Concorde

The French-built prototype Concorde 001 flew on March 2, 1969 and the British-made Concorde 002 flew on April 9, 1969. Both prototypes entered service in 1971. Commercial service began in 1976 but only 9 aircraft were ordered.

Aerospatiale/BAC Concorde

 ENGINE4 x Rolls-Royce/SNECMA Olympus 593 Mk 610, 169.1kN
    Take-off weight185066 kg408003 lb
    Empty weight78698 kg173500 lb
    Wingspan25.55 m84 ft 10 in
    Length62.10 m204 ft 9 in
    Height11.40 m37 ft 5 in
    Wing area358.22 m23855.84 sq ft
    Cruise speed2179 km/h1354 mph
    Ceiling18290 m60000 ft
    Range6582 km4090 miles

Aerospatiale/BAC ConcordeA three-view drawing (1190 x 668)

Comments1-20 21-40
Air France, 17.02.2014

I bet that the Tu-144 could beat the crap out of the Concorde. I mean, the Tu-144 is about one tenth faster than the Concorde so you see what I mean?

Scottb60, 22.06.2012

The Concorde averaged 15.8 pm/g fuel consumption compared to the 707 at 33.3pm/g, the 747 46.4pm/g and the DC10 53.6pm/g.
With 3 times the consumption the economics are not in it's favor.

Barry, 22.06.2012

See how far we have come. No one has been to the moon in over 30 years and here we are in the 21st century unable to cross the Atlantic in anything capable of exceeding Mach 1. That's progress for you.

Scott Boyd, 28.09.2011

While having a stellar career the Concorde simply became too expensive to operate. While support issues may have played a part economic reality, fuel cost especially, and suitable destination pairs made the difference.

Concorde could easily have been kept in operation for charter operations, even though operating expenses would be high a premium would have been acceptable for those who would use it.

Parts can still be found or can be replicated for DC-3's and parting out one or two of the four would have keep 1 or two running.

They all flew to their last destinations.

Mick Skinner, 27.09.2011

At the time of the only CONCORDE crash I had retired from BA but had been an engineering manager (licensed on Concorde )in the Concorde hangar for 6 years up to 1968. This aircraft was second to none in terms of performance and charisma. To put it in perspective for a few hundred pounds your granny in her sunday best could be drinking champagne and eating a steak dinner at Mach 2 when a jet jockey who is in a pressure suit and not even a drink of water in a fast jet would not be able to catch it as he would run out of fuel before getting near. There is still a lot of conjecture about the Air France Paris crash but the reason Concorde is no longer flying is only because the manufacturers stopped supporting it and without spares it was no longer a viable option.

Colin Cox, 24.09.2011

More needs writing up on this iconic aircraft. 'Gooda' copies and pastes the post by 'Ian' but there was only 1 Concorde crash, not "crashes", as mentioned.

Air France flight AF4590 crashed into the Parisian suburb of Gonesse on
July 25th, 2000 as a direct result of encountering debris on the runway
during it's take-off roll from RW26R at CDG. Other contributory factors were involved, as is usually the case with aircraft accidents. A very good account of the event can be read in Concorde Captain John Hutchinson's book, 'The Wind Beneath My Wings'. ISBN: 978-0-9562176-2-2

gooda, 20.06.2011

Excellent achievement but not financially viable for larger scale use. The crashes sealed its fate.

, 20.06.2011

Aerospatiale/BAC Concorde

leo rudnicki, 24.04.2009

There was a bad movie and all I remember was that an F4 couldn't catch Concorde. A single Concorde pilot probably had more Mach 1+ time than all the fighter pilots in history. I only remember one crash, caused by FOD. Wish I had flown in one but champagne tickles my nose.

1-20 21-40

Do you have any comments about this aircraft ?

Name    E-mail

All the World's Rotorcraft

Virtual Aircraft Museum

All rhe World's Rotorcraft AVIATION TOP 100 -