|
|
The principle of ducted fans is well understood now. They require a duct
with correct tapering at each end and a low drag but powerful engine at
its core. Multiple-bladed propellers, or a fan as on a modern high-bypass
turbofan are needed for efficiency. Placing a Tiger Moth engine inside a fat
tube doesn't cut it. An Italian government engineer, Luigi Stipa, convinced
the Caproni Company to build an aircraft to test his theory that a tubular
fuselage gave significant extra thrust to a conventional engine and propeller.
The resulting Caproni-Stipa aircraft had a corpulent annular fuselage, which
concealed a Gipsy engine and two-bladed propeller. All this achieved was
high drag and low noise, although the landing speed was reduced to 68km/h. Performance was otherwise lower than a conventional airframe
with the same powerplant.
| CREW | 2 |
| ENGINE | 1 x 120hp de Havilland Gipsy III inline piston engine |
| WEIGHTS |
| Take-off weight | 800 kg | 1764 lb |
| DIMENSIONS |
| Wingspan | 14.28 m | 47 ft 10 in |
| Length | 5.88 m | 19 ft 3 in |
| Height | 3.00 m | 10 ft 10 in |
| PERFORMANCE |
| Max. speed | 131 km/h | 81 mph |
| , 17.06.2011 Venezuela. | | Gerardo Laguna, gerardolaguna=hotmail.com, 21.07.2010 Saludos. Digno de admirar... Yo construyo y vuelo aviones RC, y estos son los modelos que prefiero en honor a los pioneros de la aviacion y como tributo a su obra ademas de la curiosidad por comprobar sus logros.Ya construi y vole un Burnelli cpy3 (donde el fuselaje ayuda a la sustentacion, que genios!!!!) por eso mi siguiente proyecto sera este precioso avion. Felicitaciones. Gerardo Laguna. Maracay, Venezuela. |
|
Do you have any comments about this aircraft ?
|
|  COMPANY PROFILE
FACTS AND FIGURES© Stipa claimed that the outer fuselage
was profiled to generate lift. It was
said that this contributed 37% of the total. © The Stipa's pilot and passenger had to
sit in cockpits perched atop the fuselage.
An inherent flaw in the design is that
there is little room for any payload. © Humped surfaces around the
cockpits would have seriously
impeded the view of pilot and
passenger unless they leaned to one
side, which would have been
essential during take-off and landing.
| |
|
|