Kawasaki Ki-100
1945
Back to the Virtual Aircraft Museum
  FIGHTERVirtual Aircraft Museum / Japan / Kawasaki  

Kawasaki Ki-100

The Kawasaki Ki-61-II with the company's Ha-140 engine was seen as an interim high-altitude interceptor to tackle the USAF's Boeing B-29s at their cruising altitude of some 9000m. However, development of the Ha-140 as a reliable powerplant was terminated finally when the Akashi factory where the engine was built was destroyed during an air raid. With the requirement becoming daily more urgent, Kawasaki was instructed to convert the 275 Ki-61-II airframes gathering dust in the Kagamigahara factory with alternative powerplant. No other similar engine was available and adaptation of the slender fuselage of the Ki-61 to allow installation of a large-diameter radial engine at first appeared impractical. However, Kawasaki's design team converted three airframes to serve as prototypes, installing a Mitsubishi Ha-112-II engine which had the same power output as the unreliable Ha-140. When the first of these was flown, on 1 February 1945, Kawasaki discovered that it had a first class fighter, one that some commentators have described as Japan's premier fighter aircraft of the Pacific war. By the end of May 1945 all of the remaining 272 Ki-61 airframes had been converted to the new configuration, entering service as the Army Type 5 Fighter Model 1A, which was identified by the company as the Kawasaki Ki-100-Ia.

With the Ki-100 proving such a success, it was decided to initiate production of this aircraft, the resulting Ki-100-Ib differing only by having the cutdown rear fuselage and all-round-view canopy that had been designed for the proposed Ki-61-III. A total of 99 of this version was built before production was brought to an end by the growing weight of USAAF air attacks. A more effective version had been planned, to be powered by the Mitsubishi Ha-112- Ilru engine which incorporated a turbocharger to improve high-altitude performance, but only three of these Ki-100-II prototypes had been built and flown by the end of the war.

Kawasaki Ki-100


Specification 
 MODELKi-100-I
 CREW1
 ENGINE2 x Mitsubishi Ha-112-II, 1125kW
 WEIGHTS
    Take-off weight3495 kg7705 lb
    Empty weight2525 kg5567 lb
 DIMENSIONS
    Wingspan12 m39 ft 4 in
    Length8.82 m29 ft 11 in
    Height3.75 m12 ft 4 in
    Wing area20 m2215.28 sq ft
 PERFORMANCE
    Max. speed580 km/h360 mph
    Cruise speed400 km/h249 mph
    Ceiling11000 m36100 ft
    Range w/max.fuel2200 km1367 miles
    Range w/max.payload1400 km870 miles
 ARMAMENT2 x 20mm cannons, 2 x 12.7mm machine-guns

3-View 
Kawasaki Ki-100A three-view drawing (752 x 963)

Comments 
Ron, toolkeeper123=roadrunner.com, 06.09.2010

Leo,
Mostly tuning. The Ha-40 and 140 were lighter than their German cousins which had tight tolerances and these lighter versions had even more precise tolerances still. So factory worker skill was at a premium.
Another thing is the quality of the fuel in the field.
Also there is the experience of the Japanese mechanics on inline motors vs German experience.
If tuning wasn't right, it could suddenly lose power.

Aaron, eaglefeather43410=yahoo.com, 13.08.2010

The ki.100 was a nasty suprise to the us. It was an awsome plane in its own right but the King and Queen of the Pacific were the F4U-4 and P-38L. Go check out there real limitations that I have discussed on this sight.

Ronald, toolkeeper123=roadrunner.com, 09.09.2009

In mock dogfights between equally skilled Japanese pilots pitting the Ki 100 Goshikisen against the Ki 84 Hayate, the Ki 100 always won. Every time! Hard to see how unless you witnessed it. The Ki 84 had the level speed advantage but it was over 40 mph slower in dive speed. Granted, the Hayate could outperform the latest U.S. fighters at medium altitudes and even out-turn the Spitfire. But the radial Tony was no Spitfire. It was somehow a superior adversary (except way up high). Add to that the fact that it had a tougher hide to absorb combat damage and was more reliably powered than the Nakajima uber fighter, perhaps the Kawasaki pilot's enthusiasm can be better appreciated. Inline Tonys have been said to out-roll (at least to the left) the U.S. Navy fighters, so maybe the radial improves roll, it should (ala Fw 190A radial vs Fw 190D inline). The right turn in the earlier Ki 61 Tony was much inferior to the left turn, maybe the Ki 100's radial helped with this flaw too. What's left? All we know for sure is the weight of the vulnerable liquid cooling required for the inline engine wasn't missed. Now it was lighter on it's feet.

Ronald, toolkeeper123=roadrunner.com, 17.06.2009

If it came out of a high speed dive it was fast. The Kawasakis were the only Japanese fighters that could hope to dive with the Mustangs. Otherwise it's true that level speed was inferior to it's fore-bear, the Ki 61-II Tony (if it was well tuned). But the Ki 100 Tony dropped the weight of the liquid cooling on the inline engine, improving it's handling. The less vulnerable radial was more reliable than other late model Japanese radial fighters like the Jack, George, and Frank. Also much sturdier than the Tojo or slower late model Oscar and Zero. At a time when Japan's young fliers had abbreviated training, such a more simple 'pilot's plane' was made to order. It proved itself a success against U.S. raiders (especially the Hellcat) out of all proportion to it's numbers at the end of the war. Maybe best isn't the word. Surprisingly effective might be the right phrase. On paper it doesn't shine, but in the air is where it counts.

Leo Rudnicki, leo_rudnicki=hotmail.com, 02.06.2009

The fastest Japanese Army fighter was the Frank, when running good. The most often called best fighter was George II, the best B-29 intercepter was Shoki, the most serendipitous mongrel hybrid was, in fact, the KI-100. At one time, the hottest fighter was the KI-61. Pappy said so. Question: what was the nature of the problem in manufacturing DB engines in the first place? I have never even heard any half-decent conjecture.

gen.Tacticus, gen.Tacticus=gmail.com, 02.06.2009

Why was it called "best Japanese fighter of WW2?"
Speed isn't exactly impressive - Ki84 is faster, maybe also N1K2-J. Is it turning radius? High-altitude performance? Thrust-to-weight?

Mick Dunne, hotideas=hotmail.com, 23.11.2008

Woah Mr Wolf! The engine that transformed the Ki61 into the world beating Ki100 was a Bomber engine!...the Mitsubishi Ha 112! The Homare was nowhere near as reliable and not considered for use in the Kawasaki fighter. But it is easy to see how you got them confused...we all do!

m.wolf, m.wolf=yahoo.com, 20.03.2008

It truly was an amazing feat of engineering that Imperial Japan could develop such a fine fighting machine at this stage of the war. She was deployed in February of 1945 at a time when Japanese industry and cities were being pummelled unmercifully by Curtis Lemays B-29 bombers. Joining a Mitsubishi Homare 112 engine with a Kawasaki KI-61 airframe was done by studying blue prints of the Yokasuka D4Y1 torpedoe plane and having help also from the Focke- Wulf staff who married a BMW 801 engine with a slim airframe and developed another fine fighting machine. The Kawasaki KI-100 was truly an outstanding fighter for its time and the pilots praised how easy it was to fly.

Cardinal Sin, 21.02.2008

Propably the best japanese fighter of WW2

Do you have any comments about this aircraft ?

Name    E-mail


COMPANY
PROFILE



All the World's Rotorcraft


Virtual Aircraft Museum


All rhe World's Rotorcraft AVIATION TOP 100 - www.avitop.com Avitop.com