|
|
An Imperial Japanese Navy specification of 1934 for a single-seat fighter with a maximum speed of 350km/h then seemed an almost unattainable target. However, Mitsubishi's Ka-14 prototype designed to this requirement, and flown for the first time on 4 February 1935, demonstrated a top speed of 450km/h in early trials. Unfortunately it had some aerodynamic shortcomings, and the inverted gull-wing of.this aircraft was replaced by a conventional low-set monoplane wing in the second prototype which, with a 436kW Nakajima Kotobuki 2-KAI-1 radial engine, was ordered into production as the Navy Type 96 Carrier Fighter Model 1 (Mitsubishi A5M1). The generally similar A5N2a which followed, powered by the 455kW Kotobuki 2-KAI-3 engine, and the A5M2b with the 477kW Kotobuki 3 engine, were regarded as the Japanese navy's most important fighter aircraft during the Sino-Japanese War. Two experimental A5M3 aircraft were flown with the Hispano-Suiza 12Xcrs engine, but the final and major production version was the A5M4, built also as the A5M4-K tandem two-seat trainer.
All versions of the A5M were allocated the Allied codename 'Claude', and
when production ended a total of 788 had been built by Mitsubishi, including prototypes; a further 303 were built by Watanabe (39) and the Omura Naval Air Arsenal (264). The Japanese army had also shown interest in the A5M, resulting in the evaluation of a Ki-18 prototype generally similar to the Ka-14, but although fast this was considered to be lacking in manoeuvrability. Mitsubishi produced two re-engined and improved Ki-33 prototypes but they, too, were considered insufficiently manoeuvrable and no army production contract resulted. At the beginning of the Pacific war the A5M4 was in first-line use, but its performance was found inadequate to confront Allied fighters and by the summer of 1942 all had been transferred to second-line duties, many surviving A5M4 and A5M4-Ks being used in kamikaze attacks in the closing months of the war.
| MODEL | A5M4 |
| CREW | 1 |
| ENGINE | 1 x Nakajima "Kotobuki-41", 530kW |
| WEIGHTS |
| Take-off weight | 1671 kg | 3684 lb |
| Empty weight | 1216 kg | 2681 lb |
| DIMENSIONS |
| Wingspan | 11 m | 36 ft 1 in |
| Length | 7.57 m | 24 ft 10 in |
| Height | 3.27 m | 10 ft 9 in |
| Wing area | 17.8 m2 | 191.60 sq ft |
| PERFORMANCE |
| Max. speed | 430 km/h | 267 mph |
| Ceiling | 9800 m | 32150 ft |
| Range | 1200 km | 746 miles |
| ARMAMENT | 2 x 7.7mm machine-guns, 2 x 30-kg bombs |
 | A three-view drawing (752 x 925) |
| John Stanley, moonstone649(@)hotmail.com, 18.03.2008 Lots nicer than my 1988 Dodge Ram 50 (made by Mitsubishi) | | Sgt.KAR98, 26.02.2008 Which one was the best? This,the P-26 or the I-16? | | weston, fu(@)wes.com, 11.11.2007 the drawing sucks | | Curtis Block, curtisblock(@)yahoo.com, 26.08.2007 In 2003 I identified the remains of an A5M4 in the wreck of the Fujikawa Maru which was sunk Feb. 1944, in Truk Lagoon, Micronesia. To my knowledge it is the only example of its type known to exist. | | Louis Dorse, Louisdorse(@)hotmail.com, 25.11.2006 Saburo Sakai, the great Japanese ace claimed the Claude type 96 was superior to the newer Zero when it came to maneuvering and dogfighting. The only advantage the newer Zero had was a much increased range. |
|
Do you have any comments about this aircraft ?
|
| |