i would think the nakajima shiden would have out-flown the p-51D at medium altitude and the mitsubishi zero could out-dogfight any plane at low altitude until the war's end.

At the end of the dear readers, it all came down to NUMBERS! Pilots and Planes!
If there were equal numbers (to USA) of even the good old Zero left in 1944 and with pilots of equal training to fly them...America would have had a helluva fight on her hands!

Did this airplane have combat flaps? and was the a7m3 planned to have 6 20mm cannons and 4 30mm cannons and 2 rear fusaloge [sry if i spelled that wrong] 30mm cannons? [thanks for the answers, and nice website]

If you want to know how the Reppu handled, read the book "Samurai" by Saburo Sakai, Japan's greatest surviving WWII ace. He mentions it near the end of his book.

do you know how the reppu handled? (in general)
like was it more manuverable than the Zero or KI 84?
more armor? etc.

of course, even if this plane had entered service in 1944, this wouldn't have change history.but if japanese had an engine development program as Pratt & Witney did, such a plane could had reach production as early as '42.japanese would'nt had lost so much experienced pilots and US air forces would had been in big trouble.the A7M2 was climbing fast, was as big but far more manoeuvrable than a P-47, and had enought armament punch.not to mention the diving speed, armor and range.by the way, construction seemed more sturdy and ceiling superior to the KI-84.this plane was a very serious threat for allies.

With the event of the P47N and the P51D with the experienced pilots the US had t is hard to believe this fighter would have had any more impact than the Nakajina Ki84 Frank did.

banzaiiiiii

It looks like a great plane and from the sound of prototype testing it could have helped the Japanese a lot! Once again the myth of the P-51 being this invincible aircraft is broken. I am sure SAM with a good pilot could go toe to toe with any American plane of the era..Nice website