Myasishchev M-4 / 3M
1954
Back to the Virtual Aircraft Museum
  BOMBER, RECONVirtual Aircraft Museum / USSR / Russia / Myasishchev  

Myasishchev M-4 / 3M

Vladimir M. Myasishchev was responsible for contributions to a number of Soviet aircraft designs from 1924, but is best known for the Myasishchev M-4 which was the nation's first four-engine turbojet-powered strategic bomber to become operational. Following its maiden flight in late 1953, the type was first displayed in a fly-past over Moscow on 1 May 1954. A mid-wing cantilever monoplane with a deep section swept wing, the M-4 has a tail unit with all-swept surfaces, and retractable landing gear comprising two main units in tandem on the fuselage centreline, each with a four-wheel bogie, plus twin-wheel outrigger balancing units which retract into the wingtips. The circular-section fuselage incorporates a pressurised nose compartment and tail turret for the crew, and a large internal weapons bay in the lower fuselage between the main landing gear units. The powerplant comprises four turbojets buried in the wing roots, these being initially Mikulin AM-3Ds each of 8700kg thrust. Designed to carry thermonuclear weapons over intercontinental ranges, the initial bomber version, which has the NATO codename 'Bison-A', is believed to have entered service initially in early 1956, and production probably totalled about 200 aircraft. Subsequent modified versions have included the maritime reconnaissance 'Bison-B', first identified during 1964, which had a radome in a solid nose replacing the glazed nose of 'Bison-A', and the even later 'Bison-C', which was also for maritime reconnaissance and introduced a larger radar installation in a lengthened nose. A number of 'Bison-A' bombers have been equipped to serve as inflight-refuelling tankers, with a hose-reel unit mounted in the bomb bay. One other version is known, a test-bed aircraft powered by four D-15 turbojet engines each of 13000kg thrust and designated 201-M This was used in September 1959 to establish a number of payload-to-height records. About 40 tanker/transport versions of the M-4 were estimated to remain in service in 1992. These are to be replaced by II-78 'Midas' tankers.

Myasishchev M-4 / 3M


Specification 
 MODEL3M
 CREW8
 ENGINE4 x VD-7, 107.8kN
 WEIGHTS
    Take-off weight202000 kg445336 lb
    Empty weight74430 kg164091 lb
 DIMENSIONS
    Wingspan50.53 m165 ft 9 in
    Length51.70 m169 ft 7 in
    Wing area340.0 m23659.73 sq ft
 PERFORMANCE
    Max. speed940 km/h584 mph
    Ceiling12150 m39850 ft
    Range11850 km7363 miles
 ARMAMENT6 x 23mm cannons, 24000kg of bombs and missiles

3-View 
Myasishchev M-4 / 3MA three-view drawing (1000 x 626)

Comments 
Alex, noreply(@)yahoo.com, 17.07.2008

Dr. Nick Stage-PHD, there are no information avaliable about Kurt Tank's TA-468A design. I think you just "make up" this project to prove thouse silly Russians can't ever come up with good aircraft.
Best of luck with your scientific and history work :-)

Maksim, 17.12.2007

A direct copy of the proposal, most probably just a sketch I can't find even on Luft'46, it sounds interesting ;)

By the way, do you know, that the B-2 is nothing more than a direct copy of the Hortens' flying wing ? ;)

Dr. Nick Stage-PHD., sarge_46077(@)yahoo.com, 17.12.2007

This aircraft's biggest drawback was it's four engines
that were gas-guzzlers, and even if it could have attacked
the continental United States, USAF F-84's, F-86's, and
F-89's, would have decimated this bomber attack groupings.
The best sustainable speed was 445-to-470 mph., not the
"advertized" 584 mph maximum speed. The F-86C Sabre Jet
USAF fighter aircraft could maintain speeds above 620 mph.

The aircraft controls required Soviet "musclemen"
to operate the avionics. Servo-systems were not yet
in full operation, during this aircraft's deployment.

This aircraft was a direct copy of Nazi Germany's
Kurt Tank's TA-468A 4-jet engined bomber proposal
of 1943-1944.

Joseph Stalin did not have the needed "aero-brain-power"
to expand this plane much beyond it's Nazi German
prototypes, so there was a high crash rate.

Promising plane, but a high rate of in-flight jet
engine fires. Faulty oil lubrication systems made this
aircraft an aerial fire-trap in medium-to-long-distance
flights. Over-heating was a constant engine problem.

It was a better air-to-air refueling plane, than a
strategic long-range bomber.

Do you have any comments about this aircraft ?

Name    E-mail


COMPANY
PROFILE



All the World's Rotorcraft


Virtual Aircraft Museum


All rhe World's Rotorcraft AVIATION TOP 100 - www.avitop.com Avitop.com