Two X-2 rocket-powered research aircraft built to explore the problems of transonic and supersonic flight. The second aircraft made the first powered flight on 18 November 1955 but was destroyed in a fatal crash on 27 September 1956 after a flight that had achieved an unprecedented Mach 3.2.
| ENGINE||1 x Curtiss-Wright XLR25-CW-1 rocket engine, 6804kg|
| Wingspan||9.75 m||32 ft 0 in|
| Length||13.41 m||44 ft 0 in|
| Height||4.11 m||14 ft 6 in|
| Max. speed||3058 km/h||1900 mph|
| Ceiling||38405 m||126000 ft|
|A three-view drawing (1274 x 838)|
|Bob Horn, e-mail, 19.08.2015 01:27|
Notwithstanding the inclination of a Bell "loyalist" to shift the blame, IIRC, the actual cause of the loss of the X-2 after its record-breaking excursion to Mach 3+ was inertial coupling, which might indeed have been avoided by making the fuselage a "wee bit longer" than it was, plus a larger fin and /or ventral stabilizer,and thus providing better longitudinal stability. Try as I might, can't recall any other craft with either a greater fineness ratio eg. F-104, SR-71, or ventral stab, eg. X-15, Mig-25, F-8U,and F-104 (again!) etc., etc.,spinning out of control at high mach numbers!
|Bob Barr, e-mail, 22.04.2012 21:30|
I remember that my Dad painted the Bell X-2. I was very proud of him. His name was William Barr.
|Ernie Gravelle, e-mail, 01.10.2011 05:05|
As I recall there were two X2 aircraft built. The first was destroyed during a flight simulation over one of the great lakes. It took the lives of two Bell employees. Am I correct???
|Ernie Gravelle, e-mail, 19.09.2011 17:17|
I was a Bell employee and was involved in the X-2 flight test program at EAFB. I will never forget the day that Mel Apt died in that crash. It could have and should have been avoided but for pilot error. Sad but true.
Do you have any comments?
All the World's Rotorcraft