|
|
However determined the majority of Americans might have been in the 1930s to maintain the nation's long-established policy of isolation, there were still numbers of radicals, in both the United States government and services, who realised that almost certainly the day would dawn when, for one reason or another, the USA would have to become involved in warlike activities. Given such circumstances, one of the essential weapons would be an advanced strategic bomber, and in the US Army men like Colonels Hugh Knerr and C.W. Howard were working steadily away in the 1930s to ensure, to the best of their capabilities, that when the moment came such a bomber would be available. This thinking had led to the introduction into service of such bombers as the Boeing B-9, and the Martin B-10 and B-12. While it was appreciated that these did not represent the ideal, they prepared the way for the procurement of a true strategic bomber.
In 1933 came the US Army's requirement for a design study of such an aircraft, then identified as the XBLR-1 (Experimental Bomber Long Range): a range of 8046km was included in the specification to provide long-range strategic capability. Both Boeing and Martin produced design studies, but it was the former company which received the US Army's contract for construction and development of its Boeing Model 294, under the designation XB-15. When this large monoplane flew for the first time, on 15 October 1937, it was then the largest aircraft to be built in the USA.
As might be expected, it introduced a number of original features, including internal passages within the wing to permit minor engine repairs or adjustments in flight; two auxiliary power units within the fuselage to provide a 110-volt DC electrical system; sleeping bunks to allow for 'two-watch' operation; and the introduction of a flight engineer into the crew to reduce the pilot's workload. Intended to be powered by engines of around 1491kW, which in fact did not materialise for some years, the actual powerplant comprised four 746kW Pratt & Whitney Twin Wasp Senior radial engines, which meant that performance was far below that estimated. Purely an experimental aircraft, it was, however, provided with cargo doors and flown as a cargo transport during World War II under the designation XC-105.
 | A three-view drawing (610 x 656) |
| MODEL | XB-15 |
| ENGINE | 4 x Pratt & Whitney R-1830-11 Twin Wasp Senior, 746kW |
| WEIGHTS |
| Take-off weight | 41731 kg | 92002 lb |
| Empty weight | 17105 kg | 37710 lb |
| DIMENSIONS |
| Wingspan | 45.42 m | 149 ft 0 in |
| Length | 26.7 m | 87 ft 7 in |
| Height | 5.51 m | 18 ft 1 in |
| Wing area | 258.26 m2 | 2779.88 sq ft |
| PERFORMANCE |
| Max. speed | 314 km/h | 195 mph |
| Ceiling | 5760 m | 18900 ft |
| Range | 8256 km | 5130 miles |
| Sgt.KAR98, 14.11.2008 No,I said it looks an early B-17,not an obsolete plane. Even the F-15 can be considered obsolete today,if you´re counting on the US techno fever. | | Murali, muralicd2002(@)yahoo.com, 07.10.2008 With those ultrawide wings and speeds it looks very primitive today. But it should 've been a marvel during the years of its development and induction. Afterall what would 've been the time spent in developing and flight testing it! Is in't it history? | | Sgt.KAR98, 15.06.2008 This plane looks to be more a primitive B-17 than a different plane... |
|
Do you have any comments about this aircraft ?
|
|  COMPANY PROFILE
FACTS AND FIGURES© The wing was so thick at the
root that it was possible for a
crew member to service the
engine accessory secrions in
flight from a passageway
extending behind the
nacelles. © With a range of over
8000km, the
XB-15 was equipped with
bunks to allow some crew to
test during the mission. © The XB-15 was fitted with a
large cargo door and hoist to
become the XC-105. Its great
lifting capacity and range (if
not speed) made it well suited
to transport missions to and
from the Panama Canal Zone. © The XB-15 was heavily armed
for its day, having six machine
guns in blisters and turrets.
Later B-17s would need twice this much weaponry.
| |
|
|