|
|
The Cessna Model 120 prototype, first flown on 28 June 1945, represented the company's attempt to capture a share of the post-war market for personal lightplanes. A two-seat cabin monoplane with a strut-braced high-set wing, it was the progenitor of derived models that ramained in production until the late 1980s. Structure was all-metal, except for fabric-covered wings, the landing gear was of fixed tailwheel type introducing cantilever spring steel main
units, and the enclosed cabin provided two seats side-by-side and dual controls as standard. Powerplant comprised an 63kW Continental engine, and the higher power of this unit by comparison with competing types, plus a low
price tag, ensured that Cessna gained an unexpectedly large measure of sales success.
The Model 120, a basic aircraft, was complemented by a 'de luxe' Model 140 which provided as standard manually actuated trailing-edge flaps, extra cabin windows and a full electrical system. When production of the Models 120 and 140 ended in 1950 more than 2,200 Model 120s and 5,000 Model 140s had been built.
| MODEL | Model 140 |
| ENGINE | 1 x Continental C-85-12F flat-four piston engine, 63kW |
| WEIGHTS |
| Take-off weight | 680 kg | 1499 lb |
| Empty weight | 408 kg | 899 lb |
| DIMENSIONS |
| Wingspan | 10.01 m | 32 ft 10 in |
| Length | 6.4 m | 20 ft 12 in |
| Height | 1.91 m | 6 ft 3 in |
| Wing area | 14.82 m2 | 159.52 sq ft |
| PERFORMANCE |
| Max. speed | 193 km/h | 120 mph |
| Cruise speed | 169 km/h | 105 mph |
| Ceiling | 4725 m | 15500 ft |
| Range | 724 km | 450 miles |
Will Mitchell, Will(@)WillMitchell.Com, 31.07.2008 I loved and learned to really fly in a 140 with an 85 hp motor. It would spin like a top and come out of the spin honestly. The gear was wide enough that it seemed stable, compared with the Piper Pacer my IP owned, but I did have a moment. Mine had buckshot dents in the left side where someone took a potshot at the previous owner. Once flying west out of the Sierras, I found myself climbing in a max airspeed dive, and then I got smart and let it climb, because later there'd be a downdraft. Topping at 13,000, I found myself scared by trees at 7,000 about fifteen minutes later. Whew! I hired someone to fly it from Calif to Okla where I was attending USAF pilot school, and he made a mistake taking off INTO the wind. At Gallup, NM, one often accepted a tailwind takeoff, because that direction the terrain drops off in front of you. Anyhow, the plane would only climb about 400 fpm at the high density altitude and possible overload, and the land was coming up at about 500 fpm. He survived. I still have the tail, seats, wheels and a door. Larry C.Miller, retiredw3, 03.05.2008 I had a 1946 C-120 for 9 years.I learned to fly a tailwheel in it.It was a great little airplane and it kept you on your toes in a crosswind landing. Glenn E. Kohr, gekenk(@)cox.net, 19.04.2008 This is the plane that I first soloed in many years ago. I still have fond memories of crosswind landings and flying backwards when we had STRONG headwinds down the runway. YES, it could actually be done.
|
|
Do you have any comments concerning this aircraft ?
|
| |