|
|
The Curtiss XP-62 was the final propeller-driven fighter built by its manufacturer and the second largest single-seat fighter of orthodox layout developed during World War II, its dimensions being exceeded only by the Boeing XF8B naval fighter. The XP-62 was ordered by the USAAF on 27 June 1941 as a vehicle for the 1715kW Wright R-3350 radial engine. Initial plans called for delivery of one XP-62 and one XP-62A and later for 100 production P-62 fighters, but it was clear almost from the beginning that the design was overweight, underpowered, and an uneconomical alternative to continued Curtiss production of the P-47G Thunderbolt. Because it would be an effective testbed for dual-rotation propellers and a pressurized cabin, it was decided on 18 July 1942 to proceed with a sole airframe, the remaining machines on order being cancelled.
Development of the XP-62's cabin pressurisation system was delayed and the aircraft did not fly until early 1944. By then even the XP-62's value as a test ship was marginal and the programme was terminated after a few hours' flying time. Though the unbuilt XP-71 and the jet XF-87 still lay ahead, the great days of Curtiss as a leading fighter manufacturer were now to become history.
 | A three-view drawing (1280 x 930) |
| WEIGHTS |
| Take-off weight | 6640 kg | 14639 lb |
| Empty weight | 5340 kg | 11773 lb |
| DIMENSIONS |
| Wingspan | 16.36 m | 53 ft 8 in |
| Length | 12.04 m | 39 ft 6 in |
| Height | 4.95 m | 16 ft 3 in |
| Wing area | 39.02 m2 | 420.01 sq ft |
| PERFORMANCE |
| Max. speed | 720 km/h | 447 mph |
| Ceiling | 10800 m | 35450 ft |
| Range | 1140 km | 708 miles |
| lee desilet, led(@)wavecable.com, 15.05.2008 It reminds me of the Curtis SB2C dive bomber used in WW11..\\Is this a predecesssor of that airplance? |
|
Do you have any comments about this aircraft ?
|
|  COMPANY PROFILE
FACTS AND FIGURES© Once production plans were
scrapped the XP-62 was
mainly used to test a new
contra-rotating propeller. © The XP-62 lost all
resemblance to its P-40
predecessors and in fact had
more in common with the
SB2C Heildiver dive-bomber. © Between design and firsr
flight, fighter development
had moved on. The heavily
framed canopy and poor reai
view were old hat by 1944. © Proposed armament was four
or eight 20mm
cannon in the wings,
although this was never
fitted.
| |
|
|