Martin AM-1 Mauler
1944
Back to the Virtual Aircraft Museum
  CARRIER-BORNE ATTACKERVirtual Aircraft Museum / USA / Martin  

Martin AM-1 Mauler

Benefiting from early combat experience in World War II, the US Navy drew up its. specification for a new single-seat carrier-based attack aircraft. The Martin Model 210 design proposal gained a contract for two XBTM-1 prototypes, the first being flown initially on 26 August 1944. A cantilever low-wing monoplane with retractable tail-wheel landing gear, powered by a 2237kW Pratt & Whitney XR-4360-4 radial engine, the XBTM-1 was tested successfully and gained a contract for 750 BTM-1 series aircraft. By the time that the first of these was flown, on 16 December 1946, the designation had been changed to AM-1 and the name Mauler selected. World War 11 had also ended, and instead of the planned procurement only 149 AM-1s (excluding prototypes) had been completed when production ended in October 1949. Initial deliveries to an active unit went to Attack Squadron VA-17A on 1 March 1948, but these aircraft saw little first-line service, being transferred to US Navy Reserve squadrons when production ended. The total of 149 built included 17 AM-1Q aircraft completed as ECM (electronic counter-measures) aircraft.

AM-1 Mauler


Specification 
 MODELAM-1 "Mauler"
 CREW1
 ENGINE1 x Wright R-3350-4 Cyclone, 2218kW
 WEIGHTS
    Take-off weight10608 kg23387 lb
    Empty weight6577 kg14500 lb
 DIMENSIONS
    Wingspan15.24 m50 ft 0 in
    Length12.55 m41 ft 2 in
    Height5.13 m17 ft 10 in
    Wing area46.08 m2496.00 sq ft
 PERFORMANCE
    Max. speed591 km/h367 mph
    Ceiling9295 m30500 ft
    Range2900 km1802 miles
 ARMAMENT4 x 20mm cannons, 2000kg of weapons

3-View 
Martin AM-1 MaulerA three-view drawing (500 x 381)

Martin AM-1 Mauler

Comments
Gregg Messel, greggbmessel=aol.com, 15.08.2011

Just saw my first Mauler at Tillamook this weekend with another aviation junkie. We hit the Evergreen museum in June and love the Tillamook. It is a neat place with most of the warbirds flyable. Still oil on the floor under the engines. I loved the dive brakes on the Mauler and how they folded together to act as flaps.
Gregg

bombardier, 2888617=gmail.com, 20.05.2011

The AM Mauler should have been selected as the standard attack aircraft instead of the Skyraider,it was faster[591km/h vs 515km/h] and could carry a much larger load

a comment or so,, klmosca=q.com, 06.09.2010

A few years back,in Lubbock,Tx.I saw my first Mauler,and it at the time was a member of the CAF there. I was just intrigued by the size and the feel of the cockpit. And I was just chasin' some sparks and trippin' breakers. Thanx

Clem Schultz, clemschultz=yahoo.com, 02.03.2010

In 1949 (Fresh from boot camp)I went to CAG-8, @ NAS JAX. was assigned to VF-82, over staffed, they sent me to VA-84. also overstaffed. When I got there, the chief pointed at the most beautiful plane I'de ever seen, (The AM-1Q) Said "Son, you're the plane captain, go clean 'er up." Only a short time though. CAG-8 shipped out and gave me to FASRON-6

Carl Felty, frazer51=yahoo.com, 31.01.2010

The Tillamook Air Museum in Tillamook, Oregon, has one of these on display. It has the P&W R4360 engine in it. If you get a chance, I recommend the museum. It's less formal than many and is housed in a WW2 Blimp hangar. I actually prefer the Tillamook museum to Evergreen Aviation Museum at McMinnville, although both are good. The Spruce Goose is at Evergreen.

Len Eisner, len83=sbcglobal.net, 01.12.2009

I was assigned to VA-84 during 1948-49. We received the AM-1 in December of 48 and carqualed on Midway several months later. The airplane was pleasant to fly if a bit heavy on the controls. Unfortunately it had a tendancy for the hook to bounce and was sent to the reserves who crashed a bunch for various reasons. Except for one occasion when a wingman chopped off a piece of my stabilizer, I survived my tour in the airplane without problems.

Edward Seay, kaminari3=bellsouth.net, 26.09.2009

thawkins is right. The AM was powered by the P&W 4360. I was stationed at NAS Atlanta, Chamblee and worked on the AM line from 1951 to 1953. I now live in Pensacola. Old number 139, pictured at the Naval Aviation Museum, was one that the check crew I was in maintained. As a 19 year old youngster, I thought it was hot stuff to taxi that big bird around. That is a cut-away 4360 sitting next to 139.

response, 12.09.2009

Yes, Jean,the aircraft gained a mostly-deserved reputation for being hard to land on carrier decks, leading to the nickname of "Awful Monsters". However, pilots who liked the plane's payload read AM as "Able Mable." They flew from aircraft carriers from 1948 to 1950, when they were replaced by the Douglas AD-1 Skyraider.They flew from shore reserve bases until 1953. Hope this answers your questions!

Jean Donelan, dgrammyj=Verizon.Net, 23.05.2008

Is this the plane that was also called the Able Mable and was used on aircraft carriers around l948 or l949?

thawkins, thawkins=integrity.com, 23.09.2007

Wrong engine!!! This aircraft was powered by th Pratt& Whitney R-4360 engine.

Do you have any comments about this aircraft ?

Name    E-mail


COMPANY
PROFILE



All the World's Rotorcraft


Virtual Aircraft Museum


All rhe World's Rotorcraft AVIATION TOP 100 - www.avitop.com Avitop.com