For a quarter-century, the McDonnell F-4 Phantom II has risen from land and sea to take command of the air, to carry out the strike mission, to fight MiGs, and to join the Thunderbolt, Mustang and Sabre among the immortals of American fighter aviation. Its bent wings, drooped tail and twin-engine configuration a trademark, the Phantom was the first aircraft which could detect, intercept and destroy any target within its radar range without assistance from surface-based radar. Built as an interceptor, it became a MiG killer, but it also excelled at ground attack, 'fast FAC', reconnaissance, and other duties.
The F-4A (US Navy F4H-1F) was a developmental variant, the first making its maiden flight at St Louis on 27 May 1958. It was followed by the US Navy's operational F-4B (F4H-1), powered by two 7711kg afterburning thrust General Electric J79-GE-8 engines. The F-4B model attained an altitude record of 30040m on 6 December 1959, a speed record of 2585km/h on 22 November 1961, and a low-altitude speed record of 1452km/h on 20 August 1962, the last-named not being beaten for 16 years!
The EF-4B designation went to one airframe used for ECM training, and two modified, development airframes bore the NF-4B designation. The QF-4B is a drone conversion. The RF-4B reconnaissance derivative served only with the US Marine Corps.
The F-4C (F-110A) was the US Air Force's first Phantom, the first example being flown on 27 May 1963. The F-4C became operational with the 12th and 15th Tactical Fighter Wings at MacDill AFB, Florida, in January 1964. Some 583 were built, 40 being transferred to Spain. The service-test YRF-4C (YRF-110A) led to the RF-4C (RF-110A), 499 of which were constructed for the photo-reconnaissance role. The F-4D Phantom fighter-bomber introduced a capability to deliver precision-guided munitions (PGM), or 'smart' bombs. Some 825 were built, including 32 delivered new to Iran and 36 transferred to South Korea.
Once in action in Vietnam in 1965, the Phantom seemed to need a gun to augment its missile armament in close-quarter battles with MiGs. The SUU-16/A 20mm external gun pod was an interim measure. The F-4E, first flown on 7 August 1965, introduced more powerful J79-GE-17 engines but its principal change was the internally-mounted M61A1 20mm cannon. Although superior pilot training would later prove more important than the cannon in establishing a 2.5-to-1 kill advantage over North Vietnamese MiG-17, MiG-19 and MiG-21 fighters, the F-4E became the definitive Phantom, and 1,397 rolled off the line. Examples were supplied to Australia (on loan), Greece, Iran, Israel, Turkey, South Korea and West Germany; and 140 F-4EJs were licence-built by Mitsubishi in Japan. The RF-4E was an export reconnaissance derivative, supplied to Greece, Iran, Israel, Japan and West Germany.
By the mid-1960s, the Phantom was just about the best-known fighter in the world. On 2 January 1967 in Operation 'Bolo', F-4Cs of the 8th TFW under Colonel Robin Olds shot down seven North Vietnamese MiGs. Increasingly, F-4Ds took over from the Republic F-105 the job of bringing ordnance to bear on Vietnamese ground targets. Visitors to St Louis, where McDonnell took over Douglas in 1967, wanted not merely to see the heavy, complex fighter put together by Herman Barkey's design team, but to buy it.
The F-4F was a specialised air superiority version for the West German Luftwaffe, and 175 were delivered. The F-4G designation had been used initially for 12 aircraft taken from the US Navy F-4B production line. They had the two-way ASW-21 data-link system for automated carrier landings, and all later reverted to F-4B standard. In the 1970s, the F-4G appellation was used again for the US Air Force's 'Advanced Wild Weasel' electronic warfare aircraft, 116 of which were converted from F-4E standard. Originally seen as a counter to enemy SAM missile sites and associated radars, the F-4G now carries out a wide portfolio of electronic missions. Aircraft are stationed as far afield as the 3rd TFW Clark Field, Philippines, and 52nd TFW, Spangdahlem AB, West Germany.
The F-4J was an improved production fighter for the US Navy with 8119kg afterburning thrust J79-GE-10 engines, enlarged wing and improved avionics. The F-4K was developed for the UK's Royal Navy and the F-4M for the Royal Air Force, though both are now operated by the latter service which, with expanded commitments following the 1982 Falklands war, has also inherited 15 ex-US Navy F-4Js. The F-4N is an upgraded 'rebuild' of the F-4B, and has in turn been converted to the QF-4N drone. The F-4S is an upgraded F-4J with wing manoeuvre slats and was the final Phantom variant to serve aboard an aircraft carrier, with VF-151 and -161 aboard the USS Midway.
Phantoms serve widely with the Reserve and Air National Guard and are likely to remain in front-line service with some air forces into the 21st century.
| ENGINE||2 x GE J-79-GE-17, 52.8kN|
| Take-off weight||20282 kg||44714 lb|
| Wingspan||11.7 m||38 ft 5 in|
| Length||19.4 m||64 ft 8 in|
| Height||5.0 m||16 ft 5 in|
| Wing area||49.2 m2||529.58 sq ft|
| Max. speed||2300 km/h||1429 mph|
| Ceiling||18420 m||60450 ft|
| Range w/max.payload||700 km||435 miles|
| ARMAMENT||1 x 20mm cannon, missiles|
|A three-view drawing (1648 x 1190)|
|stephen russell, stephenrusell=sbcglobal.net, 15.06.2008|
Sat in mock F4 cockpit on the USS Midway-midway.org.
It was some Insturment procedures Training Sim Cockpit.
See USS Midway in San Diego CA.
|Steve Sixsmith, s.sixsmith=cox.net, 30.05.2008|
I did Weapons Control (32251P)on Cs, Ds, and Es at George AFB (1967-70). To Jim Brennan's comment regarding drop tanks being converted to carry luggage, etc., I recall opening many a radome and pinning the antenna so the crew had a place to carry their golf clubs when they were off to a weekend extra section of flying for "training." Love the Phantom !
|Dan Lucero, danloosearrow=aol.com, 27.05.2008|
I was a "weapons troop" in the Air Force for 22 years. I worked on the F-4C and F-4D at Spangahlem AB, Germany. I worked on the F-4E (my favorite) at Seymour Johnson AFB, NC. Although my career included the F-111D, OV-10, F-5, A-10, and B-1B, the F-4 was, and always will be, my favorite. Even though replacing an aft Aero-7/A missile launcher could try your patience, and replacing the Armament Control Relay Panel was the worst job in the world, I wouldn't trade the "Bent Winged Beauty" for anything, no matter how high tech. My only regret is that I didn't get to see the F-4 perform as the Thunderbirds. I bet that was magnificent!
|Jorge Machado, Outcast.Haku4ever=yahoo.com, 16.05.2008|
The "thing" the Phantom needed most, in the Vietnam war, were better trained pilots. The performance of US pilots left a lot to be desired, in that regard. See, iranian pilots shot down at least 81 iraqi fighters, including 2 Mig 25's, if I remember it correctly. Yeah, it just doesn't maneuver like a Mig 19, and it might have itīs problems, but it's just a hell of a fighter. Long live to the "Smoker"!!!
|Ken Langford, liveoakken=ainternet.biz, 15.05.2008|
I flew the F-4B, F-4N, F-4J and F-4S for over 2500 flight hours and still marvel at the F-4S. Surely the Phantom will go down in annals of airplane history as one of the greatest engine to aiframe mates of all time.
|Jim Brennan, ygbsmJIM=aol.com, 11.05.2008|
External wing tank capacity was 370 gallons.
When modified by talented sheet-metal fabrication specialists they served as roomy "travel pods" -- held lots of luggage and shopping spree treasures. Fond memories!
|Butch Owens, 09.05.2008|
Worked several different models of the F-4 at Homestead AFB, FL and Udorn RTAFB, Thailand 1971 - 1973. What a nightmare to maintain but what a nightmare for MIGS when in the hands of pilots like Duke Cunningham and Steve Richey. Probably the most feared aircraft by enemy forces in history.
|Jeff Weber, jcweber=metrocast.net, 28.04.2008|
I worked on C&D models' Weapons Control Systems (radar, gunsight, bombing systems, AIM-7 guidance) while in Korea, Thailand and various US bases.
The two wing tanks shown in most pictures were 270 USgal each and both would emptied during normal takeoffs. With battle loading they would take off with almost dry tanks so they could get enough bomb weight into the air and hit a tanker ASAP.
They were built like tanks to take the pounding of carrier landings. You'll never see wrinkles in an F4.
Because of the mods required to convert them to a 'jack of all trades' they were a bitch to work on. There was always something in the way.
There are many critical comments about how poorly it flew. It was never built or designed to be fighter. It was a fleet interceptor, just like the F14 was. Thus, handling wasn't a priority, speed in a straight line was, along with weapons. It's strongest asset was its big engines.
To say 'it seemed' to need a gun is a wild understatement and a very dumb omission by the McNamara boys. But don't get me started about those guys...
|Matt Feiertag, phantomguard1964-data=yahoo.com, 26.04.2008|
All versions of the F/RF-4 had a crew of 2, not 1.
|Marv Garrison, mtgarrison2=cox.net, 02.04.2008|
This is a wonderful aircraft. I flew the F4B, F4J,F4D, F4E, and RF4B with the Marine Corps/Air Force. I have the same number of take-offs as landings.
|SCOTT DAMMANN, SAD AT COMCAST.NET, 03.11.2007|
I THINK THE F4 WAS ONE OF THE GREAT FIGHTER BOMBERS FROM VIETNAM TO IRAQ THE LATE ROBERT OLDS ONE OF THE GREAT ACES
OF THE VIETNAM WAR BUT WHY IS THE US MILITARY IS USE THE F4
AS PIOLTS TARGET DRONE ON WHERE THE PHANTOM BELONGS IN MUSEUMS IN SEND OF GONE DOWN IN FLAMES OVER THE GULF OF MEXICO I WENT TO AND NUMBER OF AIR SHOWS AT MC GUIER AFB IN NEW JERSY BACK IN 1982 WHEN I SAW A FOUR SHIP OF F4D FROM THE 141FIS AND ON THE INTREPID IN NEW YORK CITY THEN IN 1989 MY LAST FEW AIR SHOWS BUT INTILL 1992 WHEN THE 141ST WENT FROM THE F4D TO THE F4E ONE OF THE BEST VERSON OF MC DONNELL DOUGLAS F4 PHANTOM II BUT STILL THE ONE AMERICAN ICONS OF THE COLD WAR WILL ALAWYS BE THE LEGEND F4
|sumbal, sumbal2=hotmail.com, 30.11.2006|
theres a question , what is the length between the center of gravity of main wing and the center of gravity of the tail wing (horizontal stablizer)? plz reply
Do you have any comments about this aircraft ?