Tupolev Tu-4
by last date | by total length | by number


LATEST COMMENTS

22.05.2013 02:37

Lockheed L-1049 Super Constellation / EC-121

22.05.2013 01:30

General Dynamics F-111

21.05.2013 18:27

American Gyro AG-4 Crusader

21.05.2013 13:30

Convair 240

21.05.2013 09:28

Junkers Ju 390

21.05.2013 00:43

Learjet 25/28/29

20.05.2013 22:34

Heinkel He 277

19.05.2013 19:54

Mitsubishi Ki-51 SONIA

19.05.2013 08:54

Republic XP-72

19.05.2013 07:02

NAMC YS-11

19.05.2013 06:21

Douglas DC-6 / C-118

18.05.2013 20:33

Boeing B-47 Stratojet

18.05.2013 18:27

Gloster "Meteor"

18.05.2013 02:03

North American F-86D / YF-95 Dog Sabre

17.05.2013 23:06

FBA 17

17.05.2013 22:03

North American FJ-1 Fury

17.05.2013 11:51

Avro 694 Lincoln

17.05.2013 09:10

Republic F-105 Thunderchief

17.05.2013 04:58

Beech Model 18

16.05.2013 15:41

Douglas C-133 Cargomaster

16.05.2013 15:40

De Havilland D.H.82 Tiger Moth

16.05.2013 13:50

Bleriot-SPAD S.56

16.05.2013 07:27

Luscombe 8

15.05.2013 11:42

Republic P-47 Thunderbolt

14.05.2013 20:59

Potez 25

14.05.2013 20:00

Douglas A-3 (A3D) Skywarrior

14.05.2013 18:52

Heinkel He 162 "Salamander"

14.05.2013 17:08

Republic XF-84H

14.05.2013 04:46

Rawdon T-1

14.05.2013 00:34

Handley Page H.P.42 / 45


Jessssssssssssssssssssssssssss, 28.02.2013 15:16

Mariah Is A Whore


Barry, 10.05.2012 18:41

There is no doubt that the Tu-4 is a direct copy of a B29, the text above states as much. But what was copied was quite superficial. This plane does not hold a candle to the original. The aerostructure was quite different being manufactured from thicker guage lower quality metal. The overall performance was nowhere near the same, and as is usually the case when the Russkies copy something it never quite turns out as it should. The Tu160 Blackjack is a larger copy of the "Bone", is it better? No way, and in view of the fact that they only built 60 of them I think even the Russians would agree.


gurrrrrlll, e-mail, 29.11.2011 16:35

omg whsat??.


Bob, e-mail, 17.11.2011 15:35

The Stupid Russians STOLE this from the U.S. This is a B-29 There own designs were so bad they had to uce the U.S.'s


Ian, e-mail, 12.10.2010 14:20

It was a reverese engineered B29 copied from interned aircraft that made emergency landings in Manchuria following raids on Japan.


Ta-183 Huckebein, 15.05.2010 17:04

The Tu-4 is my most favorite Russain plane. The only thing I DONT like about it is that they totallly COPIED it from the B-29. JUST LOOK AT IT!! XD


gonzalo, e-mail, 30.07.2009 19:53

Un problema fue que los soviéticos usaban sistema metrico y todas ls dimensiones del B-29 estaban en sistema imperial (pies, pulgadas) por lo que la URSS debio cambiar en varias fabricas a este ultimo sistema.
Otros cambios eran tanques de combustible e goma flexible en lugar de los integrales del B-29 y la supresion de las zonas presurizadas atras de la cabina de vuelo, incluso creo que sacaron el tunel presurizado.


sergio, e-mail, 24.05.2008 23:33

gracias...


Jason Moore, e-mail, 24.05.2008 08:12

Sergio, parecian muy semejantes en los exteriores, y la estructura era lo mismo, mas o menos, pero existian muchas diferencias pequenas entre los aviones (y no pequenas, por ejemplo, el armamento defensivo en el B-29 consistia de 12.7 mm ametralladoras, pero en los ejemplos definitivos del Tu-4, el armamento era 23 mm canones). Tambien el piel era diferente - era mas grueso en el Tu-4.


Roger, e-mail, 16.05.2008 08:51

http://www.tejavia.com SELL ONE?


sergio, e-mail, 10.05.2008 23:15

cual es la diferencia de este tupolev al b-29


sergio, e-mail, 10.05.2008 23:14

cual es la siferencia de este tupolev al b-29


sergio, e-mail, 10.05.2008 23:12

wow.. cual es la diferencia de este tupolev al b-29?


If you want to send an email just replace '(@)' in the address with '@' !



All the World's Rotorcraft


Virtual Aircraft Museum


Sightseeing in Estonia