Short S.31
by last date | by total length | by number


LATEST COMMENTS

25.04.2024 10:41

25.04.2024 10:41

http://dicrpdbjmemujemfyopp.zzz/yrphmgdpgulaszriylqiipemefmacafkxycjaxjs%3F.jpg

25.04.2024 10:40

25.04.2024 10:40

25.04.2024 10:37

25.04.2024 10:33

1

25.04.2024 10:24

Aviatik (Berg) 30.14

25.04.2024 10:24

19037753

25.04.2024 10:23

1x8A3Q8tO

24.04.2024 21:53

24.04.2024 07:32

16.04.2024 02:02

Junkers Ju 390

15.04.2024 01:39

Convair 240

10.04.2024 04:14

08.04.2024 21:25

Piper PA-42 Cheyenne III / Cheyenne IV / Cheyenne 400LS

08.04.2024 12:44

Curtiss Eagle

07.04.2024 16:55

Cessna Model 305A / O-1 Bird Dog

07.04.2024 06:39

06.04.2024 15:03

Pemberton-Billing (Supermarine) P.B.31E

06.04.2024 07:27

05.04.2024 05:36

Fokker 50

05.04.2024 05:35

CASA C-212 Aviocar

05.04.2024 05:34

Saab 340

05.04.2024 05:32

Aerospatiale / Alenia ATR-72

05.04.2024 05:32

Aerospatiale / Alenia ATR-42

05.04.2024 05:29

Dornier Do-228

05.04.2024 05:26

EMBRAER EMB-120 Brasilia

05.04.2024 05:24

De Havilland Canada DHC-8 / Bombardier Dash-8 Series 100 / 200 / Q200

05.04.2024 05:23

De Havilland Canada DHC-6 Twin Otter

05.04.2024 05:19

Xian MA60


Mike Dunne, e-mail, 24.07.2015 11:00

Heard an interesting story about Captain Eric Brown looping the S-31 in front of some truly amazed fighter pilots who obviously thought, at a distance, that they thought it was a full size Stirling!! Anyone out there verify this amusing yarn?


Matt Bearman, e-mail, 10.10.2014 07:49

The 'Hangar Doors' story is an oft-repeated myth. No RAF hangar doors were 100ft.


Wrong Shorts, Ben!, e-mail, 04.06.2014 15:13

Ben, you'd be better off leaving your comment on the page for the Shorts S.29 Stirling because that is the aircraft which you are describing. This page is about the Shorts S.31 experimental test bed which, neither being a bomber nor having to traverse the Alps, was not overly hampered by it's relatively short wing.


Ben Beekman, e-mail, 07.02.2011 22:43

We can't possibly let this page go by without bringing to light the reason for this promising design's miserable performance. According to Wm. Green's book "Famous Bombers of the Second World War", Volume 2, (Hanover House,1960)the government's design specification required that the wingspan be less than the 100-foot wide door opening of standard R.A.F. hangers. The resulting low-aspect ratio wing of 99-ft 1 inch span with its high induced drag had the expected adverse effect on performance. The maximum loaded service ceiling was thus only 16,500 ft, forcing pilots who were attacking targets in Italy to fly through the Alps rather than over them! Not only that, but the size of the fuselage cross-section was dictated by the size of standard packing cases! The design of its bomb bay, divided into three longitudinal cells by two strengthening girders, prevented the carrying of the really large "blockbuster" size weapons which came into use later in the war. Another drawback was the mid-mounted wing. Though offering certain advantages in flight, the mid-wing location required an exceptionally tall undercarriage that resulted in a tendency of the loaded aircraft to swing dangerously on takeoff, especially on muddy grass fields. Only 2,375 Stirlings were ever built owing to the impossibility of modifying the design to meet the later wartime requirements.
The figures given above are for the half-scale flyable model built to perform certain aerodynamic tests and are, naturally, scaled down. The actual dimensions of the Stirling were:
Span: 99 ft. 1 inch
Length: 87 ft. 3 inches
Height: 22 ft. 9 inches
Wing area: 1,460 sq. ft.
Engines: Four Bristol Hercules XI 14-cylinder sleeve- valve, double-row, radial air-cooled engines rated at 1,590 hp for takeoff.
Weight: 59,400 lb. normal loaded; 70,000 lb. max. permissable.
Max. speed: 245 mph at sea level; 260 mph at 10,500 ft; Economical cruising speed: 200 mph at 15,000 ft
Range: 1,930 miles with 5,000 lb bombload; 740 miles with 14,000 lb bombload.




All the World's Rotorcraft


Virtual Aircraft Museum