Nanchang (NAMC) CJ-5, CJ-6A
by last date | by total length | by number


LATEST COMMENTS

25.04.2024 23:21

Junkers Ju 390

25.04.2024 10:41

http://dicrpdbjmemujemfyopp.zzz/yrphmgdpgulaszriylqiipemefmacafkxycjaxjs%3F.jpg

25.04.2024 10:41

25.04.2024 10:40

25.04.2024 10:40

25.04.2024 10:37

25.04.2024 10:33

1

25.04.2024 10:24

Aviatik (Berg) 30.14

25.04.2024 10:24

19037753

25.04.2024 10:23

1x8A3Q8tO

24.04.2024 21:53

24.04.2024 07:32

15.04.2024 01:39

Convair 240

10.04.2024 04:14

08.04.2024 21:25

Piper PA-42 Cheyenne III / Cheyenne IV / Cheyenne 400LS

08.04.2024 12:44

Curtiss Eagle

07.04.2024 16:55

Cessna Model 305A / O-1 Bird Dog

07.04.2024 06:39

06.04.2024 15:03

Pemberton-Billing (Supermarine) P.B.31E

06.04.2024 07:27

05.04.2024 05:36

Fokker 50

05.04.2024 05:35

CASA C-212 Aviocar

05.04.2024 05:34

Saab 340

05.04.2024 05:32

Aerospatiale / Alenia ATR-42

05.04.2024 05:32

Aerospatiale / Alenia ATR-72

05.04.2024 05:29

Dornier Do-228

05.04.2024 05:26

EMBRAER EMB-120 Brasilia

05.04.2024 05:24

De Havilland Canada DHC-8 / Bombardier Dash-8 Series 100 / 200 / Q200

05.04.2024 05:23

De Havilland Canada DHC-6 Twin Otter

05.04.2024 05:19

Xian MA60


Jim Goolsby, e-mail, 20.03.2013 14:25

This airplane was designed by Bushi Cheng. It is an origination Chinese design which has a common layout same as the Yak-18A, however every thing else it different. Construction, airfoil, all medal wing, flap, gear, etc. Only thing in common is the air system, instrument panel, and engine cowl design (since they used the same engine that is expected). Bushi Cheng designed the a/c system almost identical to CJ-5 at instructors request for easy follow on for them. The airfoil is the same as the T-34 not because he copied but because the airfoil fit the performance factors he was looking for. "Design follows function." I've owned a CJ-6a for over 17 years. I have thousand of hours in one and have Yaks, and other comparable trainers. It is by far the best handling for it performance class. Very forgiving and gives plenty of warning near stall. Will do ANY acrobatic maneuver except tail slides. A great airplane designed by a great designer.


MOSE, e-mail, 12.12.2012 19:54

A " rotary" engine????? I think you mean a "radial"


Dee Grimm, e-mail, 05.02.2010 00:00

It's a really great airplane. It's very easy to fly and performs well. Many that have been imported to the US have had the Chinese engines replaced with a Vedeneyev M14. That adds some horsepower and gives better performa nce in the desert area (high density altitude)of the US.


Bill, e-mail, 27.01.2010 16:51

CJ-5 and CJ-6A are not similar in any aspect, other than they each have a rotary engine, albeit different in rotation and number of cylinders. CJ-5 is identical to a Russian Yak 18 in all respects other than packarding (as far as I can tell.)


Kyaw Linn, e-mail, 01.08.2009 09:38

Dear Sir,
We would like to purchase aircraft spares from a China company.

Looking forward to your soonest reply.

Thank you and best regards,

Kyaw Linn


crazydog, e-mail, 19.08.2008 06:00

It is not an improved version of the Yak-18,their wings and structures have a lot of differents£¡£¡It is a new plane at all!


crazydog, e-mail, 19.08.2008 06:00

It is not an improved version of the Yak-18,their wings and structures have a lot of differents£¡£¡It is a new plane at all!




All the World's Rotorcraft


Virtual Aircraft Museum