|
| Concept follow-on to highly successful JetRanger model revealed at Heli-Expo in February 2002. Little concrete detail given, but artist's impression indicates more streamlined shape and wider glazed cabin, and possible seating for five or six passengers. Industry view being sought, with go-ahead decision likely early in 2003 if helicopter market improves. Jane's Helicopter Markets and Systems
| Bell Helicopter, chirag.rikhav(@)gmail.com, 08.01.2009 What A Shape, So Big Cabin, Nice Seating Space For Passengers....
I Appreciate The Artist Who Design This Model, It's Look Excellent....
http://www.directaircraft.com
http://www.directaircraft.com/blog/
http://www.directaircraft.com/link_display.php
http://www.minijetplanes.com
http://www.minijetplanes.com/blog/
http://www.minijetplanes.com/link_display.php
http://www.flypowerjet.com
http://www.flypowerjet.com/blog/
http://www.flypowerjet.com/link_display.php
http://www.airplanejunction.com
http://www.airplanejunction.com/blog/
http://www.airplanejunction.com/link_display.php | | patrick, pat412(@)hotmail.com, 18.03.2008 jrx not go anywere bell finish built 206b 2012 but why u dont talk about our new baby 429 a fantastic helicopter.ty helicopter machanic bie | | Joe, MAZZA-05(@)hotmail.co.uk, 10.09.2007 I still think this looks utter rubbish compared to the jetranger :) | | Joe, MAZZA-05(@)hotmail.co.uk, 19.06.2007 This is crap! Honestly - what was it that made the 206b so popular - the design - why change something that is perfect already - and why is bell adding 2 more blades to everything - the two bladed main rotor is always going to be the better! the jetranger is an aviation icon " worlds safest single engine aircraft" if its better than anything else - why completely change it - add something new here andf there but a whole new jetranger.....NOTHING CAN REPLACE A JETRANGER! | | Andrew, andrew(@)uplink.com.au, 04.06.2007 I am so disappointed that Bell have not gone ahead with this already. The Jetranger is 40 years old! But on the other hand, it is an extremely well-engineered piece of flying equipment so that's the reason. Why change something that works so well? | | stupid, chum_bucket(@)hotmail.com, 22.05.2007 it sucks it needs more charcteristics |
|
| |
|
Do you have any comments concerning this aircraft ?
|
| |
