Back Hughes XH-28
1981

Hughes XH-28

Development of a large helicopter was begun in January 1951 to meet an Army requirement for a flying crane capable of transporting combat-loaded military vehicles weighting up to 20 tons (18.1 tonnes). Like the XH-17 which was then about to be flown, the XH-28 was to use a pressure-jet system to drive the four-bladed main rotor, with two Allison XT40-A-8 turbines being geared to a compressor unit and compressed air dueled to burners at the tip of each blade.

Weighing 23587kg empty and 47627kg loaded, the XH-28 was to have had enclosed accommodation for two pilots. Its four tall undercarriage units, each with dual-wheels would have given it a spider look while providing adequate clearance for outsize loads. These loads were to have been either slung beneath the fuselage or carried on a flat-bed attached between the undercarriage legs and fitted with a ramp for loading and unloading vehicles.

The design was subjected to extensive wind-tunnel tests with various suspended loads, and a full-scale mock-up was constructed. In spite of its promising capability, the XH-28 was not built due to cutbacks in the research and development budget made near the end of the Korean War.

Rene J. Francillon "McDonnell Douglas Aircraft since 1920: Volume II", 1997

Hughes XH-28

Comments
Greg D, e-mail, 25.02.2024reply

Add to my last comment:
The Sikorsky Skycrane was the S-64
Check it out â€" â€" it could’ve been the son of the XH-28🤪🤪

Greg D, e-mail, 25.02.2024reply

The Sikorsky sky crane looks an awful lot like that!!! That work horse is STILL flying all over the world.
Sikorsky makes the best helicopters in the world mâ€"of course I’m prejudiced because I flew with them and US Coast Guard Way back in the early 70sâ€"HH3F which was the commercial Sikorsky S 61â€"that old gal brought me and my crew back from every single missionâ€" and I loved every second of search and rescue and medevac flying.

Dan, e-mail, 13.09.2014reply

Shame it did not get built. . Bet you it would have ended up as one of those aircraft designs that last one hundred years like the B 52 or C 130.

Dan, e-mail, 13.09.2014reply

Shame it did not get built. . Bet you it would have ended up as one of those aircraft designs that last one hundred years like the B 52 or C 130.

sgjijog, e-mail, 30.10.2007reply

this is a huge bitch

Do you have any comments ?

Name   E-mail


Virtual Aircraft Museum


All the World's Rotorcraft


Back AVIATION TOP 100 - www.avitop.com Avitop.com