|
| A model of the Ka-34 heavy rotary-wing aircraft. G.Kuznetsov "OKB Kamov - 50 years", 1999
| Shariffin, Shariffin=hotmail.com, 16.09.2011 World most beautiful & powerful workhorse.
Now do you have an agent in Malaysia. | | Shariffin, Shariffin=hotmail.com, 16.09.2011 Brautiful | | polo, poloal=aol.com, 13.06.2011 Yeah I don't know how well this would fly but it sure looks cool | | michael, discospanic=live.com, 15.02.2011 they provide vertical takeoff | | Philippe, bizel.philippe=orange.fr, 07.02.2011 What a huge might have been helicopter. I am not sure that such a unit could flight correctly. But I wish I could find a 1/72 model kit Who said ? | | syn, 20.01.2010 The Ulitimate Blinder | | James, 04.05.2009 Judging from the model, what theoretical speed could be obtained in foward flight? | | Nikos J. Farsaris, njf=freemail.gr, 18.08.2008 To morko:
Not really! they would provide lift during autorotation! Heavier load for a smaller and stiffer wing. U.S. Cartercopter is a similar concept design!
General comment:
Rather cancelled due to complexity. Soviet Union realy focused in simple designs suitable for mass production. | | Castle22r, castle=castlerockhobbies.com, 16.06.2008 Vary cool,Vary big,and probably Vary EXPENCAVE.Pardon my spelling. | | MYRON, MTOMMYJ=HOT.RR.COM, 04.05.2008 Wonder if they ever built any of these and whether (Or) Not they actually had "Flying!" examples? | | grouchy, oliverbown=gmail.com, 18.03.2008 Yeah I don't know how well this would fly but it sure looks cool | | morko, morko_morane=fastmail.fm, 29.02.2008 wouldn't that huge vertical rotors only provide drags in cruising flight ? |
|
| |
|
Do you have any comments concerning this aircraft ?
|
| |
