|
|
At the end of 1917, a derivative of the HD.1 intended for
use by France's Aviation maritime as a single-seat
fighter floatplane was tested as the HD.2. Possessing
an airframe essentially similar to that of the HD.1, the
HD.2 was powered by a 130hp Clerget 9B rotary engine
and carried an armament of twin synchronised Vickers
machine guns. Two prototypes were tested with float
undercarriages of differing lengths, and several HD.2s
with wheel undercarriages were delivered to the
Aviation maritime at Dunkirk for trials purposes. These
included operations from a 12m platform
mounted above a turret of the battleship Paris in the
harbour at Toulon. Later, in August and September
1918, similar trials were conducted at Saint-Raphael
with one of the HD.2 prototypes converted to landplane
form and re-engined with a 120hp Le Rhone. Ten HD.2 float fighters were purchased on behalf of the US Navy,
these subsequently being converted to landplanes by
the Naval Aircraft Factory. They were used for training
at Langley Field and one was employed in August 1919
for trials from a platform mounted on the battleship USS
Mississippi.
 | A three-view drawing (800 x 584) |
| MODEL | HD.2 (float-equipped) |
| WEIGHTS |
| Take-off weight | 723 kg | 1594 lb |
| Empty weight | 495 kg | 1091 lb |
| DIMENSIONS |
| Wingspan | 8.70 m | 28 ft 7 in |
| Length | 7.00 m | 22 ft 12 in |
| Height | 3.10 m | 10 ft 2 in |
| Wing area | 18.20 m2 | 195.90 sq ft |
| PERFORMANCE |
| Max. speed | 183 km/h | 114 mph |
| Ceiling | 4800 m | 15750 ft |
| Range | 300 km | 186 miles |
Bill Schultz, sbill(@)wans.net, 21.08.2007 By any chance was the HD-2 modified further by the US Navy in adding a second seat(dirctly under the wing), truncating the lower end of the rudder and adding a strut just forward of the landing gear?
This strut seems to be intended to either prevent tipping forward during landing or possibly engaging an arresting wire on a carrier deck.There is no evidence of any type of tailhook. At that stage of carrier aviation they probably had envisioned the hook concept.
I have a phot ofjust such an aircraft that looks for all the world to be a Hanriot HD-2 heavily modified as decribed above.
If in fact such modifications did take place did they redesignate the aircraft?
Any guidance you can provide would be greatly appreciated. Thanks!!!
Bill Schultz Williamsburg, VA Mystery Plane editor Virginia Aeronautical Historical Society
|
|
Do you have any comments concerning this aircraft ?
|
| |