Curtiss P-40Q

1940

Back to the Virtual Aircraft Museum
  FIGHTERVirtual Aircraft Museum / USA / Curtiss  

Curtiss P-40Q

Prior to the final termination of P-40 development, some effort was expended in combining aerodynamic refinement with increased power to produce a higher-performance model. A P-40K airframe was fitted with an Allison V-1710-121 engine rated at 1,425hp for take-off and 1,100hp at 7620m. Semi-flush low-drag radiators were incorporated in the wing centre section and a four-bladed propeller was fitted, the designation XP-40Q being assigned. A second, similarly re-engined P-40K for the P-40Q programme reintroduced the nose radiator scoop, but featured an all-round vision bubble-type canopy (previously tested on a P-40N). The definitive XP-40Q (converted from a P-40N-25 airframe) had clipped wing tips, the cut-down aft fuselage with bubble canopy and coolant radiators faired into the wing leading edges. Four 12.7mm guns were carried but proposed production models were to have carried, either six 12.7mm or four 20mm weapons. No production was undertaken.

3-View 
Curtiss P-40QA three-view drawing (1280 x 988)

Specification 
 DIMENSIONS
  Wingspan10.75 m35 ft 3 in
  Length10.16 m33 ft 4 in
 PERFORMANCE
  Max. speed679 km/h422 mph

Comments1-20 21-40 41-60
leo rudnicki, e-mail, 12.05.2009 01:24

I don't believe I ever suggested that the P-40N was the ultimate P-40 but it was the ultimate production P-40, the "Q" being a one-off. The P-40Q was much improved in performance but very short-ranged. Both the P-40Q and Fisher P-75A suffered in comparison to the Merlin Mustangs already in full production. Max Mil. hp rating for V-3420-19 was 2600hp for 15 minutes

reply

a.machiaverna, e-mail, 12.05.2009 01:13

My research shows that the Q did have six .50 calibers, and ample range, using a 1,475 h.p. Allison V1710, but still w /o supercharging. To say the P-51 was a success, would be a complete understatement, its one of aviations elite, along w / the Vought F4U. Still, the P-40 was on hand when needed, and in the hands of a seasoned pilot, not even the Mitsubishi Zero was a match. Ask the Japanese pilots who went up against the Flying Tigers in China.

reply

a.machiaverna, e-mail, 11.05.2009 14:16

Correction on Allison V-3420, h.p. output was 2,885. Slightly under anticipated output, this was not the primary factor of the failure of the p-75 design. Mixing parts from various aircraft could and did produce some surprising results. Aileron control was extremely heavy, and engineers actually calculated the center of gravity incorrectly!

reply

a.machiaverna, e-mail, 10.05.2009 23:16

If your info. is accurate, the addition of guns and fuel tanks , weight being a factor, would have brought the Q into the 400 mph range.

reply

a.machiaverna, e-mail, 10.05.2009 23:13

So you are saying the ultimate p-40 design was the N model? Still, the Q was a design w / many aerodynamic refinements, wasnt aware of absense of guns and fuel tank. The Allison V3420 did produce 2,800 hp, came too late.

reply

leo rudnicki, e-mail, 10.05.2009 07:09

Berlin left Curtiss because he was unhappy with corporate decisions which affected his designs. That the Eagle was unsuccessful could be predicated on the use of a double Allison engine being no better than a single engine. It didn't work in the Boeing B-29 version or the Lockheed P-58. How were they supposed to clean up the P-40? On the P-40Q, they removed fuel tanks and guns for performance. The P-51 had guns, fuel, and performance. Have you seen the movie,"1941' with John Belushi and the P-40? A classic. " Lemme hear your guns!" A great scene.

reply

a.machiaverna, e-mail, 10.05.2009 04:25

Why did Don Berlin go over to Fisher? His P-75 wasnt the work of a gifted aviation designer. Mixing parts of dif. existing aircraft proved unsucessful, perhaps practical in theory but unimaginative.

reply

a.machiaverna, e-mail, 10.05.2009 04:20

were dif. airframes.

reply

a.machiaverna, e-mail, 10.05.2009 03:17

P-46's etc. where different airframes.

reply

a.machiaverna, e-mail, 10.05.2009 03:17

P-46's etc. where different airframes.

reply

a.machiaverna, e-mail, 09.05.2009 01:10

my point was to clean up the p40 early on....

reply

leo rudnicki, e-mail, 09.05.2009 00:12

Don Berlin went to Fisher, Curtiss went to the toilet, and yes, Allison finally developed their engine in time to fight a Jet war. Curtiss built a turbo fighter, the P-37. Didn't work out. Took forever to lengthen the tail. The P-46 and P-60 was their attempt to clean up the P-40. The Mustang and it's pilots won the air war over Germany.

reply

a.machiaverna, e-mail, 08.05.2009 13:07

Don Berlin went over to North American? The Allison V-1710 was a rugged and powerful engine, in final form used in the twin mustang in the Korean war. Removal of the turbosupercharger doomed aircraft using this engine to medicocrity, unless of course one considers the p-38, with turbosuperchargers used to give maximum h.p. output at higher altitudes. Back to the p-40, much more rugged and manueverable than the p-51, it only lacked the turbosupercharger, and an early "clean-up" program. Curtiss became involved in too many projects, instead of focusing on this magnificent airplane.

reply

leo rudnicki, e-mail, 07.05.2009 19:00

The P40Q shouldn't be counted as a separate aircraft type but rather blocked with all Kittyhawk / Hawk 87 models, as apart from Tomahawk / Hawk 81 models. The P-40, like the Hurricane, was an effective and tractable warplane, available in quantities, thanks to an efficient production line, at a time it was sorely needed. Like the Hurricane, it was produced too long. Curtiss was a corporate entity lacking the spark of brilliance, when Don Berlin left, to create a Mustang or any other great airplane. The P40Q was , like all other Curtiss projects, almost as good, when first built, as aircraft already in service. The Allison V-1710 was nearly ready to fulfil its destiny as a Hydroplane racing engine.

reply

a.machiaverna, e-mail, 07.05.2009 04:36

Your Curtiss aircraft timeline puts the p-40q2 at 1941. Everything I have read in the past 25 years suggests this p-40 model did not appear until 1944.

reply

a.machiaverna, e-mail, 07.05.2009 04:29

Instead of wasting effort on the p-46, p-53, p-55, p-60 and p-62, Curtiss had a thorouhbred from the start with its p-40. Had it began immediately in cleaning up the high drag design, this airplane would not be a bit of an enigma, but one of aviations elite. Much more manueverable than the p-51, this would have been the star aircraft of WW2. However, often outclassed in speed during most of its service life, this rugged design certainly helped win the war.

reply

1-20 21-40 41-60

Do you have any comments?

Name    E-mail


COMPANY
PROFILE


All the World's Rotorcraft


All rhe World's Rotorcraft AVIATION TOP 100 - www.avitop.com Avitop.com