|
|
Under the designation Piper PA-20
Pacer, the company began production in 1950 of an updated version of the four-seat PA-16 Clipper. It introduced a number of improvements, including a larger area tailplane with balanced elevators, increased fuel capacity, redesigned landing gear and several interior refinements. As at first powered by a 81kW Avco Lycoming O-235-C1 engine, it had the designation PA-20 Pacer 115, but subsequent versions included the Pacer 125 with a 93kW O-290-D engine, and the generally similar Pacer 135 which introduced a variable-pitch propeller. When production ended in 1955 a total of 1,119 had been built, and the PA-20 Pacer 135 could demonstrate a maximum speed of 225km/h and had a range of 933km.
| CREW | 1 |
| PASSENGERS | 3 |
| ENGINE | 1 x 93kW Lycoming O-290-D piston engine |
| WEIGHTS |
| Take-off weight | 816 kg | 1799 lb |
| DIMENSIONS |
| Wingspan | 8.93 m | 29 ft 4 in |
| Length | 6.21 m | 20 ft 4 in |
| PERFORMANCE |
| Cruise speed | 180 km/h | 112 mph |
| Range | 933 km | 580 miles |
| Carl Felty, frazer51(@)yahoo.com, 01.02.2010 One of my students and I landed his PA-20 at Freeway Apt. in Tucson in a rather high X-wind. After coffee, on our way back to the Pacer, we watched a Cherokee pilot fighting hard to land. Two fellows were watching and one pointed to the Pacer and said "you couldn't fly that today". We climbed in and flew out. I don't think they knew about the lack of rudder in the Cherokee. The Pacer had good rudder control and we had no problems with the X-wind. | | Verne Lietz, Lietzaire(@)charter.net, 28.01.2010 I may have been mistaken about the prop on my plane. I had an Aeromatic on a PA-12, but am not sure of the make of the one on the PA-20. It was controllable with a hand knob on the left side of the panel, but had only low and high pitch with no automatic control. The PA-12 prop was automatic, the pitch controlled by RPM working on weights at the hub of the prop. | | Verne Lietz, Lietzaire(@)charter.net, 28.01.2010 Mr. Van Tries is right. I had a 1950 Pacer with an Aeromatic 2 speed prop. Mine never gave any trouble until it wore out. The PA-20s apparently weren't build very strong, though. I got caught in bad fog, started to land on a road and while in a turn at about 65 feet agl, ran through several trees. Darn wing came off ! However, while everything else was crushed, the cabin stayed quite intact and my only injuries were a lot of bruises and a scar on the forehead.(Still there 50 years later.) My plane cruised at 120 on 125 h.p., about 7 gph. | | richard van tries, pauley(@)myactv.net, 08.04.2008 This was my favorite plane, I owned one of the last of the 1955 line,N2046A Only one thing wrong, the pacer never had a controlable pitch prop. You might be thinking about the aeromatic 2 speed prop. This is a story best untold. the short story is they did not work. Most of the time i could not get it to shift. In high pitch on a go around this was no fun. PA20 was the best of line up at the time, |
|
Do you have any comments about this aircraft ?
|
| |