|
|
Despite its designation of F8U-3, the V-401, first flown on 2 June 1958, was a totally new fighter developed in competition with the McDonnell F4H-1 Phantom II. Vought received contracts for 18 F8U-3s, although, in the event, only five were actually built and two of these remained unflown when cancellation of contracts terminated further work. Known to the manufacturer as the Crusader III, the F8U-3 retained some of the features of the original F8U, such as the variable wing incidence, but was a substantially larger, heavier and more powerful single-seat fighter. The F8U-3 was powered by a Pratt & Whitney J75-P-5A engine affording 7484kgp boosted to 13381kgp with afterburning. Provision was made for a 2722kgp Rocketdyne auxiliary rocket motor in the rear fuselage, and the all-missile armament consisted of three beam-riding Sparrow III AAMs. The F8U-3 had a forward-raked, variable-position, chin-type air intake, and a pair of large ventral fins was linked to the undercarriage retraction mechanism, being raised to the horizontal position when the wheels were extended and adopting a near-vertical attitude when the wheels were retracted. The F8U-3 attained 2832km/h, or Mach=2.6, during flight test, but Vought believed that it was capable of Mach=2.9. With selection of the F4H-1 as the US Navy's next generation shipboard fighter, the F8U-3 was cancelled, the three examples flown having accumulated a total of 190 flight tests.
| MODEL | F8U-3 |
| WEIGHTS |
| Take-off weight | 17587 kg | 38773 lb |
| Empty weight | 9917 kg | 21863 lb |
| DIMENSIONS |
| Wingspan | 12.16 m | 40 ft 11 in |
| Length | 17.88 m | 59 ft 8 in |
| Height | 4.98 m | 16 ft 4 in |
| Wing area | 41.80 m2 | 449.93 sq ft |
| PERFORMANCE |
| Max. speed | 2345 km/h | 1457 mph |
| Range | 3289 km | 2044 miles |
 | A three-view drawing (1680 x 1193) |
| Mike Garcia, mqgarcia39(@)yahoo.com, 31.01.2009 The F8U-3 may have lived on. I hired as an enginner at LTV summer of 1962, worked on the last of the F8U-2's and then the A-7A. I was in the Wing Section and told that LTV saved time and money by using the F8U-3 rudder actuator for the A7A Aileron actuator with a slight change in hydraulic port locations. I was told that Vought was working on an improved windshield and frame to withstand the higher heat before the contract was terminated, so we will never know if the 2.9 Mach was feasible. I think it would have been. | | Nick Nickerson, ceilingzero(@)cfl.rr.com, 12.07.2008 I was a FRP in VF-124 in 1959 when they brought one to Moffet for us to admire. It was an awesome looking machine. | | Dave Winiker, DWiniker(@)aol.com, 12.07.2008 In response to Terry Nelson's comment below, the Navy had concluded that it should have a 2 engine, 2 place fighter and opted to buy the F-4 instead. (Perhaps it was due to our squadron's (VF-154) experience with the F-8U-1.) | | Terry Nelson AO3 USN, terrygator39(@)yahoo.com, 14.07.2007 Saw two at Alameda NAS in 1959 and was impressed. We airdales could not understand why the Navy chose the F4 over such a fast aircraft as this. It flew a lot faster than the listed speed, so fast that the canopy would change due to heat friction. That from a pilot. |
|
Do you have any comments about this aircraft ?
|
| |